Hi there,
After reading your last response to me and your responses to other people, I noticed some common elements. No matter what's presented to you, whether it's a readily available poll with copious information that treats the questions you're asking in great detail, whether it's being asked in various ways to support what you're stating (beyond expressing strong feelings), or evidence contrary to your feelings, it's somehow not enough. I recently found that there's a name for the sort of thing you're doing, and it's called sealioning. Here's a brief definition:
"Sealioning is not predicated upon any implicit understanding of public/private space, but upon the premise that the asker is "sincere" and therefore all resources possible *must* be immediately diverted to teaching them, immediately. The resources that they could, with minimal effort find, are not the issue. They demand attention - your attention. All of it. RIGHT NOW. And they have no intention of listening, because it's your job to make them understand. It is a specific form of harassment. You may not look away, or point them to a link. You must spend all your time and energy. This isn't a sincere attempt at anything. It's a calculated technique to grind an opponent down."
(via Quora; there are any number of definitions available online)
You may genuinely want to understand why opponents of "the religion of peace" believe what they do. I realize that may be a possibility. We cannot do all the work for you, however. We cannot read and consider polls and books and articles for you. We do not possess the indefinite amount of time necessary to explain explanations and then the explanations to the explanations. There is a burden on the person making positive claims. Following from the absence of evidence in favor of your claims: "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
Best,
S.
