I
I detest theo von cock and bertie vinegar tits,so
Guest
FAO dumb and dumber (yup, theo von cock and vinegar tits)
Posted By: I detest theo von cock and bertie vinegar tits,so what? (range217-43.btcentralplus.com)
Date: Tuesday, 24 May 2005, at 9:07 a.m.
In Response To: Concerning the trite theaterics and obsessive, hackneyed attacks (only Paul and Flawed should read) (Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade)
> Frankly, during the periods when "Paul" was almost being himself
> there turned out to be nothing interesting about him or anything he had to
> say.
So you don't like me then?
I'll get over it.
Still, at least I posted about Morrissey regularly, can you say the same?
>No wonder he resorts to his fantasyland games.
If provoked I will retaliate, it's that simple.
I have kicked your spotty arse all over this board many, many times.
You are in denial if you think you are liked by anyone other than the tedious American freaks you suck up to.
>His one big
> accomplishment was to harass David Tseng into removing the photos feature
> on the forum.
He did that of his own accord. He used every means at his disposal to try and undermine me, by allowing others to attack me, yet deleting my posts almost immediately, and by using his control of the site to try and silence me so I couldn't defend myself.
All the insane, overblown attempts to get me off the site because I had dared to challenge his authority stemmed directly from him being a bitter control freak.
>What a guy. If anyone wants insight into how wacked Paul is,
> simply read this (well, no one could actually read it all, so skim it):
> http://www.morrissey-solo.com/comments.pl?sid=18446&op=&threshold=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=156967
OK, that's twice you have posted that link in the past week, although your point is still completely lost on me.
Unless of course you are giving me credit for posting such a sincere and honest message to Bertie/realitybites?
I have no reason whatsoever to be embarrassed by that post, on the contrary, I think it is beautifully written and that the author should be admired for his candour and respected for his attempt to rationalise the irrational.
However, it didn't stop her from shrieking my name the minute someone criticised her on this board recently.
As I explained recently, it was in my interest to return briefly, to close the lying mouths of you and she, in order to protect my good name.
> It's odd that such a small forum would be plagued by two such extreme and
> obsessive mental patients as Paul and Andy Ison, who have been doing their
> moronic and boring acts for years. Either they're the same person or
> there's something in the water in England. If Andy Ison is fake, there's
> no doubt the only one f***ed up enough to be behind it is Paul. If she's
> real, I hope she seeks help and takes "Paul" with her.
Andy Ison is infinitely more interesting and entertaining than you will ever be, I have laughed out loud on occasion reading her posts, I have NEVER laughed or been remotely interested in any of your pompous drivel.
> Whatever the case, I don't care. If England has such a problem with
> lunatics they should build more hospitals.
Since you're so fond of Jehne, why not read her journal entry where she talks about having anorexia, about being suicidal and generally being a f*** up.
Also could I draw your attention to your other American friend codreanu, who is a walking chemist and takes so much anti-mad medication that he rattles when he walks.
I strongly suspect that you too are fast heading for a nervous breakdown when you realise how wrong you are about everything.
No my tedious friend, put your own house in order before casting aspersions elsewhere.
> Perhaps it's time to say this about his one friend, the 49 year old hag
> with the mentality of a teenager: Never liked her. Have always found her
> dumb, phoney, always in character, and obnoxious. It's pathetic to witness
> someone who finds herself clever when in fact her enfant terrible
> personality reveals an embarassing middle-aged woman trapped in
> juvenility. Behind the scenes emails to others on the site would confirm
> that when she asked if she was an "ally" of mine I lied in order
> to spare the forum another round of her tedious spaz fits, and because as
> a general rule I don't like to shun anyone.
> Paul, if you're so interested in sagging breasts, I doubt you'd have to
> look further than that silly woman pushing 50 in Liverpool who is your one
> and only friend.
And yet you castigate me for the virulence of my attacks on bertie?
The difference is that bertie will use any means necessary, be it posting private entries from her journal that were not intended for the public boards, to posting doctored pics of other users, to personal attacks about someone's appearance.
Whereas Irene has never done any of these things, under much more provocation than anyone else on this site.
YOU are the chief culprit when it comes to a sustained and vicious campaign against someone, as you have just proved by your disgraceful tirade against Irene.
You sir, are a coward and a hypocrite.
> As for me, I've always had a thick skin about attacks. Never cared about
> the opinions of strangers, particularly online.
Yes, so we see.
This is only the latest of literally dozens of whining posts about people picking on you.
What you are is a big f***ing cry baby.
I've found that people
> online who attack people they don't know tend to be projecting. This makes
> one feel a touch of compassion for the fool. However, I do become hostile
> when I witness others attacked in a way that attempts to add to the pain
> of their very real family tragedies. That's beyond the pale. I'm happy to
> get on with virtually anyone from any walk of life holding any
> opinions...except for the heartless and the cruel.
Once again, let me refer you to your spiteful onslaught against Irene.
As for the rest of your post, you had obviously ran out of things to say, yet you said it anyway.
The simple fact is, if you were to say all of this to my face I would knock you out.
Fortunately for you (conveniently, one could also say) there is an ocean between us, so in the absence of being able to seek satisfaction in the traditional manner, all I can do is to wish you dead via a low-quality website.
Now shut the f*** up you dull c***.
Posted By: I detest theo von cock and bertie vinegar tits,so what? (range217-43.btcentralplus.com)
Date: Tuesday, 24 May 2005, at 9:07 a.m.
In Response To: Concerning the trite theaterics and obsessive, hackneyed attacks (only Paul and Flawed should read) (Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade)
> Frankly, during the periods when "Paul" was almost being himself
> there turned out to be nothing interesting about him or anything he had to
> say.
So you don't like me then?
I'll get over it.
Still, at least I posted about Morrissey regularly, can you say the same?
>No wonder he resorts to his fantasyland games.
If provoked I will retaliate, it's that simple.
I have kicked your spotty arse all over this board many, many times.
You are in denial if you think you are liked by anyone other than the tedious American freaks you suck up to.
>His one big
> accomplishment was to harass David Tseng into removing the photos feature
> on the forum.
He did that of his own accord. He used every means at his disposal to try and undermine me, by allowing others to attack me, yet deleting my posts almost immediately, and by using his control of the site to try and silence me so I couldn't defend myself.
All the insane, overblown attempts to get me off the site because I had dared to challenge his authority stemmed directly from him being a bitter control freak.
>What a guy. If anyone wants insight into how wacked Paul is,
> simply read this (well, no one could actually read it all, so skim it):
> http://www.morrissey-solo.com/comments.pl?sid=18446&op=&threshold=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=156967
OK, that's twice you have posted that link in the past week, although your point is still completely lost on me.
Unless of course you are giving me credit for posting such a sincere and honest message to Bertie/realitybites?
I have no reason whatsoever to be embarrassed by that post, on the contrary, I think it is beautifully written and that the author should be admired for his candour and respected for his attempt to rationalise the irrational.
However, it didn't stop her from shrieking my name the minute someone criticised her on this board recently.
As I explained recently, it was in my interest to return briefly, to close the lying mouths of you and she, in order to protect my good name.
> It's odd that such a small forum would be plagued by two such extreme and
> obsessive mental patients as Paul and Andy Ison, who have been doing their
> moronic and boring acts for years. Either they're the same person or
> there's something in the water in England. If Andy Ison is fake, there's
> no doubt the only one f***ed up enough to be behind it is Paul. If she's
> real, I hope she seeks help and takes "Paul" with her.
Andy Ison is infinitely more interesting and entertaining than you will ever be, I have laughed out loud on occasion reading her posts, I have NEVER laughed or been remotely interested in any of your pompous drivel.
> Whatever the case, I don't care. If England has such a problem with
> lunatics they should build more hospitals.
Since you're so fond of Jehne, why not read her journal entry where she talks about having anorexia, about being suicidal and generally being a f*** up.
Also could I draw your attention to your other American friend codreanu, who is a walking chemist and takes so much anti-mad medication that he rattles when he walks.
I strongly suspect that you too are fast heading for a nervous breakdown when you realise how wrong you are about everything.
No my tedious friend, put your own house in order before casting aspersions elsewhere.
> Perhaps it's time to say this about his one friend, the 49 year old hag
> with the mentality of a teenager: Never liked her. Have always found her
> dumb, phoney, always in character, and obnoxious. It's pathetic to witness
> someone who finds herself clever when in fact her enfant terrible
> personality reveals an embarassing middle-aged woman trapped in
> juvenility. Behind the scenes emails to others on the site would confirm
> that when she asked if she was an "ally" of mine I lied in order
> to spare the forum another round of her tedious spaz fits, and because as
> a general rule I don't like to shun anyone.
> Paul, if you're so interested in sagging breasts, I doubt you'd have to
> look further than that silly woman pushing 50 in Liverpool who is your one
> and only friend.
And yet you castigate me for the virulence of my attacks on bertie?
The difference is that bertie will use any means necessary, be it posting private entries from her journal that were not intended for the public boards, to posting doctored pics of other users, to personal attacks about someone's appearance.
Whereas Irene has never done any of these things, under much more provocation than anyone else on this site.
YOU are the chief culprit when it comes to a sustained and vicious campaign against someone, as you have just proved by your disgraceful tirade against Irene.
You sir, are a coward and a hypocrite.
> As for me, I've always had a thick skin about attacks. Never cared about
> the opinions of strangers, particularly online.
Yes, so we see.
This is only the latest of literally dozens of whining posts about people picking on you.
What you are is a big f***ing cry baby.
I've found that people
> online who attack people they don't know tend to be projecting. This makes
> one feel a touch of compassion for the fool. However, I do become hostile
> when I witness others attacked in a way that attempts to add to the pain
> of their very real family tragedies. That's beyond the pale. I'm happy to
> get on with virtually anyone from any walk of life holding any
> opinions...except for the heartless and the cruel.
Once again, let me refer you to your spiteful onslaught against Irene.
As for the rest of your post, you had obviously ran out of things to say, yet you said it anyway.
The simple fact is, if you were to say all of this to my face I would knock you out.
Fortunately for you (conveniently, one could also say) there is an ocean between us, so in the absence of being able to seek satisfaction in the traditional manner, all I can do is to wish you dead via a low-quality website.
Now shut the f*** up you dull c***.
