Morrissey in todays Telegraph

[Hideous jape]

Taken from the papers website, Morrissey likens killing a stag is like killing a child.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...ng-a-stag-is-the-same-as-killing-a-child.html

 

[Raphael Lambach]

It's not a new news however it was cited on Front Row days ago. And this article is horrible. I don't know why it was necessary to be published... I cannot see point to do it...

 

[I am a Ghost]

"The outspoken vegan voiced his unease that the Prime Minister is a fan of his former band during an interview with BBC Radio 4's Front Row programme.

Vegetarian Morrissey said it was a ''moral issue'' because Mr Cameron had hunted stag in the past."

 

[Raphael Lambach]

"The outspoken vegan voiced his unease that the Prime Minister is a fan of his former band during an interview with BBC Radio 4's Front Row programme.

Vegetarian Morrissey said it was a ''moral issue'' because Mr Cameron had hunted stag in the past."

Did you understand why I said this article is horible and badly written?

 

[I am a Ghost]

Did you understand why I said this article is horible and badly written?

No. Can you explain it to me again?

 

[Raphael Lambach]

No. Can you explain it to me again?

Unfortunetely this article is uncredited, but the journalist made confusion with vegan and vegetarin meanings and said Morrissey is both - which is incorrect as we know.

 

[I am a Ghost]

Unfortunetely this article is uncredited, but the journalist made confusion with vegan and vegetarin meanings and said Morrissey is both - which is incorrect as we know.

 

[Raphael Lambach]

Perfect.....

 

[anon x]

"Killing a stag is like killing a child. What's the difference?''

Oh dear. He does say some really stupid things.

 

[mcrickson]

"Killing a stag is like killing a child. What's the difference?''

Oh dear. He does say some really stupid things.

I would agree with you on the "Chinese-subspecies" controversy, but this, I feel, is more passionate than stupid. Unless you meant in terms of saying things that could cause more controversy. But I suppose he'll speak his mind regardless.

 

[anon x]

I would agree with you on the "Chinese-subspecies" controversy, but this, I feel, is more passionate than stupid. Unless you meant in terms of saying things that could cause more controversy. But I suppose he'll speak his mind regardless.

Perhaps I should have added crass and inane too .

 

[majic_johnson]

Another entirely pointless piece from the Telegraph...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...ssey-but-even-David-Cameron-has-feelings.html