I declare a photoshop job. That facial expression is too familiar.
Offensive, offensive, offensive...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdtDujXCcAABh4L.jpg:large
Total fake, but very funny, thanks for the link!
P.
I declare a photoshop job. That facial expression is too familiar.
Offensive, offensive, offensive...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdtDujXCcAABh4L.jpg:large
Did anyone see in The Sun about 10 autobiographies you'd rather bin and Morrissey's was third? Probably because the people who voted were too interested or finding it too difficult to read The Hungry Caterpillar.
It would seem that the desire to discredit Morrissey outweighs any sense of compassion toward your fellow human beings,
lynnda
he really needs to get back to his quiet considered appreciation for the animal liberation front.
also that he rapes children.
Everyone gets the irony; it isn't subtle or clever in any way, and the reason that this is so offensive has little to do with Morrissey. I check this site for information about an artist who is very dear to my heart, then I click on a story link and see a photo of slaughtered animals thrust in my face. Set aside the obvioius hatred that some posters (and moderators) have for Morrissey and consider what this imagery does to anyone who is a vegetarian or an animal advocate. You may not share the same philosophies, but it would be common decency to just consider how this photo might impact others. It would seem that the desire to discredit Morrissey outweighs any sense of compassion toward your fellow human beings, and if you find a man standing next to dozens of brutally murdered creatures makes you laugh, then I would question your very disturbing sense of humor.
lynnda
Vegetarianism has long suffered from an image problem and it would be churlish to fail to recognise Morrissey's exceptional influence in helping to change that perception particularly back in the eighties when he was at his peak. He seems no longer interested in persuading people to become vegetarians, and now, perhaps with that barmy PETA arch-hypocrite "Insulin" Ingrid Newkirk whispering in his suddenly tone deaf ear, or perhaps because he senses he may have little time left, has decided to dabble in what the politically correct might term extremist language, but I would say was acting like a prick.
I suspect the clock may be ticking on Morrissey the man, and that knowledge may have driven these increasingly bizarre outbursts. That's fine, if he believes it, but the real impact of such statements is to alienate people from his cause, not attract them. Morrissey seeks revolution now, quite possibly because he hopes to be around to see it. In seeking immediate change, by talk of paedophilia and concentration camps, he in reality delays it.
This is intensely offensive. Brian is dead. How dare they use his name and description for their hate-filled purposes?
http://www.creweguardian.co.uk/announcements/other/8883075.brian_ford/
he really needs to get back to his quiet considered appreciation for the animal liberation front.
No, I asked for clarification as to what he meant by "humasexual", bearing in mind Gore Vidal's description of himself as "pansexual" and his alleged proclivities, so get your facts straight and stop lying.
This is intensely offensive. Brian is dead. How dare they use his name and description for their hate-filled purposes?
http://www.creweguardian.co.uk/announcements/other/8883075.brian_ford/
As an animal rights activist myself, I must say that I hate PETA.
They're obviously trying to do the right thing, but they seem to lack all understanding of how the human psyche works. They are a burden; they make the whole cause look bad by trivializing important questions with naked celebrities and ridiculous attacks. It's f***ing infuriating, and it's sad to see that Morrissey has apparently adopted their way of doing things.
Compassion is a two way street, and I'm not sure Morrissey today deserves much, if any.
As an animal rights activist myself, I must say that I hate PETA.
They're obviously trying to do the right thing, but they seem to lack all understanding of how the human psyche works. They are a burden; they make the whole cause look bad by trivializing important questions with naked celebrities and ridiculous attacks. It's f***ing infuriating, and it's sad to see that Morrissey has apparently adopted their way of doing things.
Surely Lynnda, you see that Morrissey shows no compassion for his fellow human beings, almost certainly including you, and definitely including me. Compassion is a two way street, and I'm not sure Morrissey today deserves much, if any. That wasn't always the case.
Vegetarianism has long suffered from an image problem and it would be churlish to fail to recognise Morrissey's exceptional influence in helping to change that perception particularly back in the eighties when he was at his peak. He seems no longer interested in persuading people to become vegetarians, and now, perhaps with that barmy PETA arch-hypocrite "Insulin" Ingrid Newkirk whispering in his suddenly tone deaf ear, or perhaps because he senses he may have little time left, has decided to dabble in what the politically correct might term extremist language, but I would say was acting like a prick.
I suspect the clock may be ticking on Morrissey the man, and that knowledge may have driven these increasingly bizarre outbursts. That's fine, if he believes it, but the real impact of such statements is to alienate people from his cause, not attract them. Morrissey seeks revolution now, quite possibly because he hopes to be around to see it. In seeking immediate change, by talk of paedophilia and concentration camps, he in reality delays it.