You still haven't looked at the official stats have you. The largest group of offenders of knife crime are Afro-Carribbean. So why are you calling them Muslim. 15% of Afro-Caribbeans are Muslim so why are you constantly talking about Muslims? I am only talking about the actual stats as stated in the freedom of information request. The Stat compilers are the Police.
I never even mentioned white gangs running around. I was dealing with statistical facts ie the two largest groups of knife offenders being Afro-Carribean and European White. Other ethnicities you mention are reported in different groupings and they don't figure in the top 3 groups. The stats detail many different ethnicities, not just a vague "black" grouping like you are doing.
You have access to the Met's street-gang database. Lol!
If you would like to actually look up the Met's Gang Matrix statistics you will see that just under 20% of all gang activity in London on their matrix are from White gangs. This information produced by the Met is publicly available on their Gang Matrix Review. It shows the largest groups are again Afro-Caribbean and BAME but to state that there are no white gangs in London is just false and stupid. There have been gangs based around white housing sectors for years. 20% is not an insignificant figure. Feel free to look this up.
Why are you stating that most knife crime is committed by African immigrants? This isn't true as per the London Police statistics. If you bother to actually read them. I'm not interested in your personal agenda based opinion. I an interested in the statistical facts. It's also well known that for political reasons the police do some very dodgy things (like ignoring rape gangs for decades because of them being Muslim and their chosen victims working class white girls).
It is absolutely irrelevant to this discussion as to who is attacking who. The important statistic is what groups are committing knife crime and as shown in the link the 2 highest groups by a significant way ahead any other groups are Afro-Caribbeans and White Europeans. Somalians etc are not in those two groups not matter how much you wish them to be.
The knife crime statistics you provided are
bullshit.
I want to see a list with all black categories lumped together (West Indian and African - which includes Christians and Muslims) just like they lump the whites into one list. But fair enough, any category of blacks being top of the London stabs is fine by me.
What
does bother me is the white statistic which takes second place, albeit a good way behind the 'Afro Cs'. It is vastly exaggerated. In London every time a black boy is stabbed and the perpetrator's name and picture is revealed they are virtually always black - brown occasionally but never white. Your stats make whites the second largest category of knife crime. Okay. But what incidents does the Met Police regard as 'knife crime'?
I'll tell you - and this will reveal why stats (especially from the police) are
complete and utter bullshit.
Blacks commit such a
colossal level of stabbings (both fatal and non) in London that, due to political correctness, the police desperately attempt to even out the figures. They do this by increasing the technical definition of knife crime when it is recorded. For example, a burglar caught carrying any sharp tool will be massaged into the stats of knife crime incidents. As will a car thief caught with a screwdriver. Sometimes even drug addicts arrested with needles in their possession have been classed as 'knife incidents'. Or a boy searched with a knife.
Turks, Kurds and Albanians can easily be added to the 'white list' too. And Albanians in particular are well known for their criminality.
I do not doubt that many burglars, car thieves and smackheads in London are white. I would also wager that many working class white boys in London carry knives for protection (as they are vastly outnumbered these days by working class black boys who hang in bullying packs).
All these white 'non-stabbing' incidents are 'creatively' added to the "knife crime" stats to bulk up the white stats because in reality they are sorely lacking. With all their imposed 'targets' the police are well known for this kind of thing. And they do it in various ways with
all their statistics, not just knife crime - working more like a company fiddling its sheets, or a worried political body, than a police force whose main aim is to protect the public. This trend of fiddling stats came into its own when New Labour and Blair took power. He encouraged the NHS to creatively fiddle due to impossible imposed targets.
There are various personal police memoirs out there on the market that will attest to these facts if you're interested. It's also well known that for political reasons the police do some very dodgy things (like ignoring rape gangs for decades because of them being Muslim and their chosen victims working class white girls).
Again, if the stats you provided concerned
actual stabbings (not whatever the police choose to include in their nebulous 'knife crime' category i.e. whatever the hell they like) a more truer picture would emerge. In London it would probably look more like this:
Black stabbing perpetrators (both West Indian and African including Somalians): 99%
White English stabbing perpetrators: 1% (and these would likely be domestic incidents).
And this is why looking for 'evidence' and presenting 'official stats' when you have no clue of a subject is useless.
Oh, and the 'white gangs' you refer to are almost certainly professional outfits who work at a high level (such as those on the Met's Tiberius Report). Classic clever and tough Brit gangsters - not silly blacks with Ali G accents running round stabbing people over a remark on snapchat. Real men.
