Morrissey and his links to paedophiles? - thecolemanexperience

You think those ads generate a lot of dollars for David? No way. This is not a profit generating enterprise. Perhaps the ads fund the cost of the servers. But his labor and the labor of the mods is not being compensated.

Yes, I do think that because I happen to know that. What particular figures do you have available, RB?
 
No, posting a link is generally not considered a violation, because, well it's just a link.

If someone came on the site and posted the content I'd have to look at the post.

So can I start linking to porn, or do I have to specifically seek out Morrissey-related porn if I want to do that?
 
No, posting a link is generally not considered a violation, because, well it's just a link.

If someone came on the site and posted the content I'd have to look at the post.

No.

Terms of Service state: "You agree not to... upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content that is ... defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;"

You made the content available. You published something which you had every opportunity and, frankly, every reason to reject.

Sorry, David, but you're wrong on this. You should have knocked it back. You decided to publicise a baseless, month-old blog post produced by a disturbed, anti-Semitic, homophobic hate-monger. You chose to publicise his appalling, utterly unfounded comments about Morrissey on the internet's foremost Morrissey news site. You chose to publicise this on the front page of the internet's foremost Morrissey news site, as if it was actual news.

You need to admit your error in judgement. I don't believe this was a malicious act of vengeance but it was definitely a mistake. A huge mistake.

Make it right.
 
Who made you the person that determines what is baseless and what is not? You can certainly come here and comment on your findings and debate but don't demand censorship.

I publicize a lot of things that aren't 'news'. The TOS is interpreted by me (not you) and I determine the link is not a violation.

No.

Terms of Service state: "You agree not to... upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content that is ... defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;"

You made the content available. You published something which you had every opportunity and, frankly, every reason to reject.

Sorry, David, but you're wrong on this. You should have knocked it back. You decided to publicise a baseless, month-old blog post produced by a disturbed, anti-Semitic, homophobic hate-monger. You chose to publicise his appalling, utterly unfounded comments about Morrissey on the internet's foremost Morrissey news site. You chose to publicise this on the front page of the internet's foremost Morrissey news site, as if it was actual news.

You need to admit your error in judgement. I don't believe this was a malicious act of vengeance but it was definitely a mistake. A huge mistake.

Make it right.
 
Last edited:
No, posting a link is generally not considered a violation, because, well it's just a link.

If someone came on the site and posted the content I'd have to look at the post.

Listen david, like crystal says...this is false logic. The anonymous person above is correct...."it is defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or

otherwise objectionable." It is all of that...we're not talking about news.

Look...I've made many mistakes in my life. It always worked out better for me and everyone else to admit it...learn from it and then move on and be a better person for it.

Show us what you've got...Show us what you're made of. You are human...everybody makes errors. You are not a god...even if Jehee...thinks so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Listen david, like crystal says...this is false logic. The anonymous person above is correct.

Look...I've made many mistakes in my life. It always worked out better for me and everyone else to admit it...learn from it and then move on and be a better person for it.

Show us what you've got...Show us what you're made of. You are human...everybody makes errors.

Are you by any chance autistic?
 
Listen david, like crystal says...this is false logic. The anonymous person above is correct...."it is defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable." It is all of that...we're not talking about news.

Look...I've made many mistakes in my life. It always worked out better for me and everyone else to admit it...learn from it and then move on and be a better person for it.

Show us what you've got...Show us what you're made of. You are human...everybody makes errors. You are not a god...even if Jehee...thinks so.

pass me the sick bucket
 
Look...you said the other day...that you like this site just the way it is.....this is not true.

I said I was happy with the way the site was run, yes. I am not happy with some of the personalities on display here--you being one of those saddos. But just like IRL, you cannot surround yourself with only like-minded, affable folks.

You didn't like it when I was mean to you....and you didn't like it when Crystal was mean to you. It was obvious that she and I were getting under your skin.

Mean to me? Not hardly. I have fended off far worse, IRL and online. Geezer just shows herself to be mentally unstable and crude when she posts. It is no reflection upon me whatsoever. My behavior and posts show who I am--good or bad. Not hers. You have shown yourself to be obsessive, vindictive, a horrible guest, a broken record, to be without humor or wit. You remind me of those annoying fundamentalist Christians who can't accept no for an answer.


We did it on purpose to make a point. My motivation was a little bit different. I think this site can be better. Ethically and morally. And you've got the rules in place as I'm pointing out.


The point you both made is that you have shown yourselves to be unlikeable and horrible people that no one in their right mind would invite into their homes for tea.

Terms of Service...and Member Conduct. Please read them.

Please stick them where the sun don't shine.

I shave my head..ha. Not bald...ha.

You do not shave your head because you are a young punk or a skinhead. You shave it because you are a middle aged balding man and you have no other choice but to do the combover, toupee, or plug thing. I bet you have spent cash on Rogaine.

Actually I'd be willing to pay a yearly fee to be a member of a well run site.

Keep your money. The cost of having to prostitute himself to a tool like you is too high.
 
I said I was happy with the way the site was run, yes. I am not happy with some of the personalities on display here--you being one of those saddos. But just like IRL, you cannot surround yourself with only like-minded, affable folks.

Mean to me? Not hardly. I have fended off far worse, IRL and online. Geezer just shows herself to be mentally unstable and crude when she posts. It is no reflection upon me whatsoever. My behavior and posts show who I am--good or bad. Not hers. You have shown yourself to be obsessive, vindictive, a horrible guest, a broken record, to be without humor or wit. You remind me of those annoying fundamentalist Christians who can't accept no for an answer.

The point you both made is that you have shown yourselves to be unlikeable and horrible people that no one in their right mind would invite into their homes for tea
Please stick them where the sun don't shine.

You do not shave your head because you are a young punk or a skinhead. You shave it because you are a middle aged balding man and you have no other choice but to do the combover, toupee, or plug thing. I bet you have spent cash on Rogaine.

Keep your money. The cost of having to prostitute himself to a tool like you is too high.

Ha...I could level you with snide, cruel remarks because you are so transparent....it's pitiful.

But as you raise your child ...remember that the rules only apply to him.

See how happy you'll be with that decision when he realizes you are a hypocrite.
 
Ha...I could level you with snide, cruel remarks because you are so transparent....it's pitiful.

But as you raise your child ...remember that the rules only apply to him.

See how happy you'll be with that decision when he realizes you are a hypocrite.

What child? My son is a a happy, well-adjusted grown man who has been living on his own for the last four years.

My son adores me, btw. And I adore him as well. Best thing I ever did was having him. Best accomplishment was raising him and seeing him become the wonderful, kind, loving, generous, intelligent, perceptive, talented, and funny person he is.
 
What child? My son is a a happy, well-adjusted grown man who has been living on his own for the last four years.

My son adores me, btw. And I adore him as well. Best thing I ever did was having him. Best accomplishment was raising him and seeing him become the wonderful, kind, loving, generous, intelligent, perceptive, talented, and funny person he is.

The point is if you raise a child like you want this site to be run....

Where the leader or parent (david t.) has a different set of rules and can do whatever he wants...but the kids (us and all posters) can't.

Then you are going to have trouble.

And if there are no rules at all for anybody...you're going to have trouble and controversy.

That's why I say some one has to lead or set an example...

I find it very interesting that david t. has a posted set of rules for everyone, including him and the moderators and he says he is the "decider" forget the rules......where have we heard that before.
 
The point is if you raise a child like you want this site to be run....

Where the leader or parent (david t.) has a different set of rules and can do whatever he wants...but the kids (us and all posters) can't.

Then you are going to have trouble.

And if there are no rules at all for anybody...you're going to have trouble and controversy.

That's why I say some one has to lead or set an example...

I find it very interesting that david t. has a posted set of rules for everyone, including him and the moderators and he says he is the "decider" forget the rules......where have we heard that before.

you's two should shag
 
You do not shave your head because you are a young punk or a skinhead. You shave it because you are a middle aged balding man and you have no other choice but to do the combover, toupee, or plug thing. I bet you have spent cash on Rogaine.

I shave my head....because when it's 90 degrees in the shade and there's a fire....this helmet is unbearable.

I'm a firefighter.

Oh well I tried to post a pic....I'll figure it out later,
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0154.jpg
    IMG_0154.jpg
    401.8 KB · Views: 7
The point is if you raise a child like you want this site to be run....

Where the leader or parent (david t.) has a different set of rules and can do whatever he wants...but the kids (us and all posters) can't.

Then you are going to have trouble.

Mommy drives, drinks, votes, pays bills and taxes, has sex with adult men (and women), has a cell phone. Junior throws mud pies, cries when he scrapes his knee, plays with trucks in a sandbox, watches cartoons all day on Saturday, and wears training pants.

Adults and children say and do different things. They have different rules they must adhere to. Mommy gets to say and do things junior can't. Junior gets to say and do things Mommy can't. Tell me if this is still unclear. If so, I am certain my son can give you a call and explain it to you.

And if there are no rules at all for anybody...you're going to have trouble and controversy.

That's why I say some one has to lead or set an example...

OK Heir Keene. Lay out the rules of your dictatorship. How would you rule the roost?

I find it very interesting that david t. has a posted set of rules for everyone, including him and the moderators and he says he is the "decider" forget the rules......where have we heard that before.

Repeating what was asked by Johnny, do you have Autism? Seriously, do you?

First off David has already stated that he does not follow other rules. I merely suggested that he COULD if he wanted to as it is his site--not yours.
 
Last edited:

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom