Morrissey Central: "The Guardian Strikes again... and again..." (November 24, 2019)

https://www.morrisseycentral.com/messagesfrommorrissey/the-guardian-strikes-again

"THE GUARDIAN STRIKES AGAIN … AND AGAIN .. AND AGAIN … AND AGAIN … AND AGAIN … AND AGAIN … AND AGAIN … AND AGAIN …"

November 24, 2019

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/11/24/guardian-julia-wong-smears-breitbart/

---

Central posts a caption and URL which links to the following story:

Far-Left Guardian, Julia Wong Deliberately Omit Key Facts in Piece Smearing Breitbart

The person cited tweeted on October 27 about Morrissey:


(In direct response to that shirt as also highlighted by The Guardian).
Regards,
FWD.

Update (courtesy of @Radis Noir):

 

[Anonymous]

Sticking up for Breitbart? f*** him. Is there anyone left who doesn't think he's a far-right apologist now? The evidence is right above you. On a broader point - his source of information is so narrow, so pointed, that he thinks everything else is a lie and the enemy. Imagine. Imagine being that isolated - surrounded by people you've paid to tell you you're right...

Anyone who thinks otherwise might like to go to this event featuring some of his favourite people.

Yawn off you bore. Imagine being as isolated as you are. Megatit.

 

[Anonymous]

Morrissey has unlimited stupidity. I mean, just how many nails does he need in that coffin of his?

It provides more evidence of how utterly lost he is. For The Guardian to be described as far-far left is just hilarious. A better description would be: appealing to the middle class with tumbling circulation.

For those of you that will opine "what Morrissey means is ..." do enjoy whatever delusion you conjure.

 

[Anonymouswithapologies]

But there isn't. At least there hasn't been anything new in the Guardian about him. What has happened here is that Wong wrote an article detailing how Facebook still tolerates far-right groups despite claiming to the contrary. Breitbart and other racist sites have taken issue with this and launched numerous, often racist, attacks on Wong. Because Wong previously tweeted something derogatory about Morrissey he has now weighed in with Breitbart against Wong, presumably to 'get his own back.'
He's just getting involved with some far-right bullies and helping them give Wong a good kicking. What a man, eh? Getting involved in the racist bullying of a female journalist? Are there no depths to which he won't sink in pursuit of utterly destroying his career?

the one who is bullied is - morrissey.


obtuse and obsessive racist! yells** are her only trait for being journo in the guardian. morrissey was right wearing that shirt.



your grouping into left-right/black-white/day-night bores me. i don't read guardian, nor breitbart.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
** there is a wandering troll on this site with similar disorder

 

[Anonymouswithapologies]

But there isn't. At least there hasn't been anything new in the Guardian about him. What has happened here is that Wong wrote an article detailing how Facebook still tolerates far-right groups despite claiming to the contrary. Breitbart and other racist sites have taken issue with this and launched numerous, often racist, attacks on Wong. Because Wong previously tweeted something derogatory about Morrissey he has now weighed in with Breitbart against Wong, presumably to 'get his own back.'
He's just getting involved with some far-right bullies and helping them give Wong a good kicking. What a man, eh? Getting involved in the racist bullying of a female journalist? Are there no depths to which he won't sink in pursuit of utterly destroying his career?

for bold

she's a female journalist as i am kim jong un

 

[Surface]

Don’t play dumb. It is Wong who wrongly called Moz ‘racist twat’ in a tweet (as shown above), a depth to which not even The Guardian itself has sunk. Now someone exposes her other ‘articles’ are also horribly biased, which looking at her Twitter will not surprise anyone. She’s more like an activist than a journalist. Good for her, but hardly an excuse for ‘more lies’.

However you choose to look at this, he has now associated himself with yet another dubious outlet,

 

[Eldritch]

only thing sad is your using of the term.

well, do you think he has right to point out at an example of continuous bloody media hackle against him? obviously not.

you wait till the pope says something about morrissey.

This whole debacle has practically nothing to do with Morrissey. He's just thinking that enemies of his enemies are his friends -- even if they are right-wing racists.

 

[nicky wire's legs]

my mozzer is anything BUT a BORE. dumb broad.

 

[Deleted member 29417]

I was thinking earlier that M hadn't said anything stupid for a few weeks and I was wondering if Katsis had finally managed to rein him in. Oh no. I mean, publicly sticking up for Breitbart? I didn't read far into the Breitbart piece, not wanting to sully myself, but their description of the Guardian as 'far-left' is so laughable that why would anyone take them seriously to begin with?
So Morrissey has once again allied himself with the racist far-right and has once again kicked the wasps' nest. His need to constantly play the victim is becoming worryingly ingrained and tediously predictable.

Katsis isn't going to reign him in, from what I've seen he's even more combative & doesn't really know what he's up against.

I loathe the online left & their platform building pile-ons as much as I loathe the alt-right's meme wars, so I don't care that he's mad at a Guardian hack - but it's obviously image madness to promote Brietbart (although, on a side note, Brietbart is like Spiked or The Spectator, it's quietly going around picking up disillusioned minorities & centrists horrified by the double standards of Identity politics & is inching itself into the mainstream).

 

[Anonymous]

Breitbart. Really. Oh Morrissey my love, what have you become?

 

[Anonymouswithapologies]

This whole debacle has practically nothing to do with Morrissey. ...

i agree. his name and acts are welcomely misused.

...
He's just thinking that enemies of his enemies are his friends -- ...

you canNOT know what he thinks, you can only guess

even if they are right-wing racists.

blatant points like this are left for use to those who were let to 'make you feel that your mind isn't your own'.

 

[Deleted member 29417]

she is the one who called him a racist. i would have prefered his own thoughts put into words as an explanation without the help of obscure media outlets as verbal support. but then, he does what he does, and i'm not his mama in emotional symbiosis to tell him differently.

I think you'd probably just get a howl of pain. He was always hypersensitive & now he's discovered social media, where the nastiest things get the most clicks. Poor sod needs rescued from algorithms & name-searching.

 

[Doolittle]

But there isn't. At least there hasn't been anything new in the Guardian about him. What has happened here is that Wong wrote an article detailing how Facebook still tolerates far-right groups despite claiming to the contrary. Breitbart and other racist sites have taken issue with this and launched numerous, often racist, attacks on Wong. Because Wong previously tweeted something derogatory about Morrissey he has now weighed in with Breitbart against Wong, presumably to 'get his own back.'
He's just getting involved with some far-right bullies and helping them give Wong a good kicking. What a man, eh? Getting involved in the racist bullying of a female journalist? Are there no depths to which he won't sink in pursuit of utterly destroying his career?

Care to provide an example? And does the fact that she's a female mean she shouldn't be criticized? I don't quite understand the last part, but it sounds rather sexist to me.

 

[Deleted member 29235]

Care to provide an example? And does the fact that she's a female mean she shouldn't be criticized? I don't quite understand the last part, but it sounds rather sexist to me.

Morrissey is no stranger to misogyny.

 

[NealCassidy]

Wong?

 

[NealCassidy]

Who is white and who is wong I cannot say

 

[Doolittle]

Morrissey is no stranger to misogyny.

He's actually quite the feminist, and you still haven't answered either question.

 

[Anonymous]

He's actually quite the feminist, and you still haven't answered either question.

A 'feminist' who endorses a political party whose leader (a woman, and yet) decries feminism as 'the new misogyny'.

 

[Deleted member 29417]

The worst thing is, it's an accurate article - so if people start calling him a racist for posting it, it's going to reinforce his belief that accusations of racism are being used to cover up facts & impose ideology.

 

[Deleted member 29417]

He's actually quite the feminist, and you still haven't answered either question.

Yes, he's not a misogynist, although his extreme disdain for heterosexual marriages has led him to say awful things about brides & grooms.

 

[gashonthenail]

Isn´t it funny how those who like to constantly accuse others of being racist, often use blatantly racist language themselves. Skinny - over to you...