New Balls Please: The Case Of The Missing Balls - Peter Katsis via Morrissey Official FB

New Balls Please
The Case of the Missing Balls

- By P. Katsis

Ho Hum……..another boring day, another boring story in The Guardian about Morrissey.

How long ago was that comment about Mr Robinson? More than a month ago?

And The Guardian are still writing about it?

Must be sad for the editors to know they need to write about Morrissey in order to have anyone buy or read their shit paper.

Must be even more disappointing for them that the event they helped back in Manchester on Sunday night was a complete failure.

No one attended.

Bottom line is Morrissey doesn’t need Mr Lee, or The Guardian, for anything.

He is still doing quite fine, even in the UK.

At this point The Guardian could not be more predictable. More insignificant to the music audience. I did not think that possible to be honest.

Most folks know The Guardian has had it out for M for years now.

And most folks realize that when the Guardian prints a headline saying Former Morrissey fans plan an anti-racist rally, …..
that nobody involved with planning the rally was an ex-Morrissey fan.

The Guardian is but one thing.

Where are the music writers who actually have balls? Are there any contrarians left out there?

Anyone that appreciates that an artist actually has any opinions at all?

Or still writes socially conscious lyrics in his music?

We all hate Trump over here, but I’d like to think we are not all mindless idiots with the same cookie-cutter opinions on every subject.

Since when do the N.M.E. and Noisey agree with The Guardian about anything?

Where has the “Underground" gone?

Plus let’s face it…...

Despite what you think of his political opinions, has anyone known Morrissey to have actually committed a crime?

Or even been accused of committing any crimes?

Do you really think he backs everything that Tommy Robinson believes? Or just his thoughts on Immigration?

When he talks about The Chinese being a sub-species, is he really talking about the Chinese people??

Or is he more than likely making reference to the Chinese government and their unforgivable treatment of animals?

When he starts a comment off by declaring that he hates rape, and hates to hear that anyone has to deal with abuse…..

is he really backing up Kevin Spacey like every headline posted???

Or was he saying it was unlikely that particular 14 year old didn’t suspect what he was getting into by going to that room?

By making any commentary, does Morrissey deserve the same treatment by the press as Kevin Spacey, Harvey Weinstein, R Kelly, or Brand New?

People that have actually been accused rape and abuse?

So why does he get included with all of them? Because his opinions deserve that inclusion? Give me a break.

How come there is never a voice raised to point out the obvious?

Because the bottom line is it’s always a better headline when an editor hand picks the parts of the comment that implies the worst.

Certainly controversy has always been king, but never so much as it is now in this “click bait” world that we live in.

Controversy pays off big. So who are we kidding? It’s clear these editors have their agenda set. Pure capitalism.

And if you are a “Has-Been Haslam” type, and you have a book coming out, then….. why not take a shot?

The press will cover it and you’ll get some attention you can’t get any other way.

Smarter people are hopefully not fooled by that kind of crap, but…..some people only read the headlines, and…...

...what’s sad is if folks read enough of those headlines they almost become fact in the ether of today’s version of “the truth”.

Of course I have to admit I’m just a Yank so I can’t even pretend to be an expert on the UK press or British politics.

Although it certainly appeared to be a very interesting day in politics in London yesterday.

The world is a mess right now. Plenty of liberals have mixed opinions for the first time.

And certainly in this age of political correctness and #metoo it would be best to say nothing.

But from this outsiders view, and what no one seems willing to say, is that the UK press seems to have lost their balls somewhere.

Has anyone seen them? - PK



Save the messenger shooting please.
Regards,
FWD.


Related item:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Give your baldy head a rub for good luck for us.
Not shaved it today and the things I take means I will never go bald.

Bald head is where har follicles are dead and shaved head is where they are still alive.

You finally run out of things to say and turn to aggression and hate like all you antifa's do.

You're so weak and never served your own country traitor.
 
ANYWAYS!! PUT OUR SHIT BEHIND US AND LETS BRAIN FORCE AN ENGLAND WIN!!:soccerball::soccerball::soccerball::soccerball::soccerball::soccerball::soccerball::soccerball::soccerball:
England are only for true nationalists who are not for immigration of any kind but sadly many of those are bandwagon jumpers who burn and hate the st george whenever there is no football on tv.
They should be laid to rest with coffins draped in that flag.
 
Conspiracy only remains one until it has been a proven fact which is of course the case with everything you are denying so you are now the conspiracy dude.
Grow some balls and grab a pussy!
“You finally run out of things to say and turn to aggression and hate like all you far right goons do”

You spout aggression and hate all over these boards and over anyone who doesn’t agree with you, like a manic, retarded Skinny - and yet you have the nerve to say that Charlie Cheswick is the aggressor. Sickening!
 
“You finally run out of things to say and turn to aggression and hate like all you far right goons do”

You spout aggression and hate all over these boards and over anyone who doesn’t agree with you, like a manic, retarded Skinny - and yet you have the nerve to say that Charlie Cheswick is the aggressor. Sickening!
Nope!

The tide has turn and the far right are debating and the lefties are hating. Your time is over.
 
Nope!

The tide has turn and the far right are debating and the lefties are hating. Your time is over.
Judging by your posts this is obviously not the case. Keep trying.
 
England are only for true nationalists who are not for immigration of any kind..........
Well there it is, the stupidest thing I’ve read all day.
Nearly 50% of England’s team are the children of first or second generation immigrants.
Idiot plastic patriot
 
He's just stoking up the fire again. I'm surprised that Moz or his management would even bother replying or commenting on this shit. The press is out to get Moz and he bares his neck to them every time.
As much as I like Moz, Katnips comments about what Moz meant when he said 'the chinese are a sub species' is a load of bollox. You don't get to rewrite history.

Joan Baez has a great song about Bob Dylan in which she sings, "You who are so good with words/And at keeping things vague/Because I need some of that vagueness now".

Those words fit the Moz of the last several years perfectly. The more specific he gets about his actual political beliefs, the more his art suffers and the less his audience likes him.
 
Well there it is, the stupidest thing I’ve read all day.
Nearly 50% of England’s team are the children of first or second generation immigrants.
Idiot plastic patriot
Body paint, mate, body paint!
 
The England team is one thing, but the French team?

They look like they're Straight Outta Compton!
They are
The Kalergi plan means no one on the pitch will be white.
But that's not racism they tell us.
I never liked the zoo....
 
Joan Baez has a great song about Bob Dylan in which she sings, "You who are so good with words/And at keeping things vague/Because I need some of that vagueness now".

Those words fit the Moz of the last several years perfectly. The more specific he gets about his actual political beliefs, the more his art suffers and the less his audience likes him.
Probably the most insightful comment I've read here in a long time.
 
I've been the person with the sharpie in pocket who punctuates signs on the sly.
That is better than the guy in Casino who punctuates necks with his pen. Gotta love Joe Pesci.

url
 
Then why didn't he say that "people who are cruel to animals are a sub-spacies"? No, he said that "the Chinese are a sub-species" -- which literally means that the Chinese people, no matter how they treat animals, are one rung lower on the evolutionary ladder. The idiot just put his foot in his mouth once again.
.


I disagree.

In context of the subject that he and the interviewer were discussing
it's obvious he was speaking about those horrific acts practiced by those people in China against animals.

And I'm sure he assumed people ( giving them the benefit of the doubt) would read his comment within the context of the subject matter discussed in the interview and the reader would then understand exactly what he meant. But unfortunately some did not. And most seem to have read this comment out of context of the interview, therefore never seeing in what context he said it.

I also feel that he may have not later explained what he meant simply because in spite of the consequences he knew that this would bring at least some attention to the subject he feels strongly about and so in turn would be giving a voice to the voiceless.

Well attended by the literate.









'oh my god its robby' disagrees with me, so I guess you're in good company.:lbf:
 
Last edited:
.


I disagree.

In context of the subject that he and the interviewer were discussing
it's obvious he was speaking about those horrific acts practiced by those people in China against animals.

And I'm sure he assumed people ( giving them the benefit of the doubt) would read his comment within the context of the subject matter discussed in the interview and the reader would then understand exactly what he meant. But unfortunately some did not. And most seem to have read this comment out of context of the interview, therefore never seeing in what context he said it..
I see, so a man known for having a way with words just happened to be stunningly inarticulate when discussing a subject near and dear to his heart. :rolleyes: Or just maybe he does really believe that certain types of people have more value than others, not as much as non human animals of course ;)
but methinks that no matter what he might say, there would always be some people that would explain it away :straightface:
sort of like with the rabid right wing Trumpers here in the USA, that really think old trumpie is gonna make America great again :crazy:
 
Last edited:
I see, so a man known for having a way with words just happened to be stunningly inarticulate when discussing a subject near and dear to his heart. :rolleyes: Or just maybe he does really believe that certain types of people have more value than others, not as much as non human animals of course ;)
but methinks that no matter what he might say, there would always be some people that would explain it away :straightface: sort of like the rabid right wing Trumpers here that really think trump is gonna make America great again :crazy:

can you try that again ? thank you.
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom