TTY: Morrissey groped at San Francisco International Airport

UPDATE Oct. 6:

Morrissey airport security incident CCTV video posted - Gawker

UPDATE 1:50 PM PT
:

Uncleskinny posted the link:

A TSA spokesperson has denied any officer misconduct to Rolling Stone. "TSA takes all allegations of misconduct seriously and strives to treat every passenger with dignity and respect," Mike England says. "Upon review of closed circuit TV footage, TSA determined that the supervised officer followed standard operating procedures in the screening of this individual."

UPDATE July 31:

Morrissey claims sex assault by security at US airport - BBC News

Excerpt posted by klaus:

He added that the arrival of a second person to screen Morrissey was normal, and helped "to ensure the passenger does not have threat items, such as explosives concealed under clothing."



San Francisco International Airport
- true-to-you.net
29 July 2015

On leaving the US on 27 July I flew from San Francisco International Airport to London on flight BA 284.

At 2:30 in the afternoon I went through the usual airport security procedure including the stand-up 'scanner', and all was well - no bleeps and nothing unusual.

Before I could gather my belongings from the usual array of trays I was approached by an "airport security officer" who stopped me, crouched before me and groped my penis and testicles. He quickly moved away as an older "airport security officer" approached.

The officer who sexually assaulted me was identified as the General Manager On Duty. Luckily I was accompanied by two members of British Airways Special Services, who were horrified at the sexual attack and suggested that I lodge a complaint. I asked if there would be any point in lodging a complaint since, as with any complaint against a figure in "authority", the complaints are simply collected in order to protect the guilty officer should the matter go further. The British Airways Special Services employees assured me that a complaint was worthwhile, and so I filed the appropriate information. However, before doing so, the guilty "officer" was confronted, and the conversation went thus:

You have just sexually groped this man.
Officer: That's just your opinion.
What you have done is illegal.
Officer: That's just your opinion.
You have no right to do what you have just done.
Officer: That's just your opinion.

Apart from "that's just your opinion", he would not comment, even though, since the penis and testicles were mine and no one else's, then my opinion must surely have some meaning. But, of course, what the airport security officer was saying was: your opinion will never count in the eyes of the law. The words "that's just your opinion" volunteered themselves from this 'officer's' mouth before he had even heard the question. He knew he could be confronted, but he also knew that he could never be challenged (even though the entire incident is most certainly on CCTV camera).

In the interests of imperishable bureaucracy my submitted complaint against this 'officer' will obviously be either unread or ignored because, as we all know, on matters of officialism it is not possible to be pleasantly surprised by anything at all. However, what is clear is that, should you find yourself traveling through San Francisco International Airport, you should expect sexual abuse from the so-called 'security officers' who, we are unconvincingly warned, are acting only for our security.

Do people have minds?

Morrissey
29 July 2015



Media coverage:
 
Last edited:
The old "standard procedure" line. Bastards. I had an almost identical experience at an airport last year. I say almost because I don't have a penis or testicles. I was travelling alone and no one around seemed to notice/care so I got my bag and carried on half embarrassed, half scared and that was that. I wish i had said something but i just wanted to move on. It did not feel good and I'm sorry that Moz experienced that feeling too.
 
Well he has said there are explosive kegs between his legs, can't be too careful.......
 
Maybe airport security wanted to make sure Morrissey had no explosive kegs between his legs?!
 
Luckily, the whims of individuals are not considered in calculating risk. There are many situations where you might have to suffer a 'grope' - several Moz gigs have featured staff that went quite far checking audiences. How is security helped by avoiding certain areas of a body as it might prompt a hurumph or ffs off someone? Nobody cares in the long run. Even innocent people stopped in the street have to endure such hardships when searched by police - they don't really interpret it as sexual interference.
If I can travel safely - grope away. Stop being so precious and guarding about something even your mother might of touched.....
Dear God.

But the thing is: you still can't travel 100 per cent safely. In fact, nobody ever will. There goes your illusion, sorry. It's quite sad, they got you big time. Did they manage to frighten you with the prospect of your own death which will come to you anyway? Oh dear ...
 
Luckily, the whims of individuals are not considered in calculating risk. There are many situations where you might have to suffer a 'grope' - several Moz gigs have featured staff that went quite far checking audiences. How is security helped by avoiding certain areas of a body as it might prompt a hurumph or ffs off someone? Nobody cares in the long run. Even innocent people stopped in the street have to endure such hardships when searched by police - they don't really interpret it as sexual interference.
If I can travel safely - grope away. Stop being so precious and guarding about something even your mother might of touched.....
Dear God.

Sorry but no, this is all going a bit 'if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear'. 'security' doesn't mean you can violate someone's bodily autonomy at will.
 
"Stop being so precious and guarding about something even your mother might of touched..." Don't know whether this is more aimed at Morrissey or people in general but how about we DON'T. Why should we? We are no one elses to touch. Have low standards if you like but I'll keep striving for respect.
 
The manager has come out in a statement saying he was simply checking Morrissey for a suspiciously large package...
 
Sorry but no, this is all going a bit 'if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear'. 'security' doesn't mean you can violate someone's bodily autonomy at will.

Oh well, time for wine...
Please tell the group how people get searched without 'violation'. Some people don't like being touched at all... Yet can't escape airport security if they want to fly. Again, the issue is more to do with your ability to understand things than mine to explain them.
A Policeman pats you down - something you can't argue out of - violation or safety procedures (ask a Judge if unsure).
An airport thinks you have coke in your arse - you are made to defecate into a pot after a body cavity search - violation or SOP for such a situation?
A person's crown jewels are knocked being searched (like many, many others) as part of 'homeland' security - sexual assault or just something that happens - like being made to empty your bags and take your shoes off?
As for 'at will' - ridiculous.
I doubt, seriously, staff were walking round cupping people's bollocks as and when they felt like it.
If I am searched as part of any security procedure and my tackle is touched - so what? I suggest you write congress about the hive of depravity airports have become and see how far you get...
Goodnight,
FWD
I hope my tailor has a good explanation for that vigorous inside leg measurement.....
 
Last edited:
UPDATE: A TSA spokesperson has denied any officer misconduct to Rolling Stone. "TSA takes all allegations of misconduct seriously and strives to treat every passenger with dignity and respect," Mike England says. "Upon review of closed circuit TV footage, TSA determined that the supervised officer followed standard operating procedures in the screening of this individual."

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/n...ual-assault-at-san-francisco-airport-20150730

If this is the case they can provide the CCTV footage to Morrissey and he can review it with his lawyers and decide if a formal complaint of sexual assault to the San Francisco Police Department is necessary. Or he can put it on YouTube and let the mob decide. He is not the only person who has felt assaulted by airport screening but he is unusual in having credible witnesses on hand to validate and verify his accussations. CCTV is only one part of this.

best
GoBB
 
Morrissey says assault which is a very ambiguous term when applied to a body search.
I see what he describes on episodes of Cops nightly - part of a search procedure includes the genitals.
If they thought he had coke in condoms in his gut, he'd of been doubly assaulted, but in reality - famous or not, it can happen to anyone.
Consent is not part of that. Much like if you refuse to take your shoes off.
Again, complaints about security procedures is nothing compared to alleging sexual 'assault' - his words - the way to deal with that is not how he went about it.

- - - Updated - - -


It's sarcasm aimed at casual anons who probably went through what I described.
Much like someone who finds time to pick out my comment rather than engage with the main point - equally 'silly'?

Airport Security have to have a valid reason for touching your dick and balls. They can't just randomly grope people, which is what Morrissey describes. And they certainly can't expect to normalise that pathological behaviour with anyone other than you. As for cavity searches, you are clutching at straws having made a fool of yourself. It is indeed sexual assault to trespass on the bodily integrity of a passenger without justification which has to be provided to any investigation. Given that Morrissey didn't trigger any technological alarms there is a clear case for the Security agent to provide an explanation and rationalisation for his decision to trespass on Morrissey's bodily integrity. You are a useful idiot and part of the Panopticon Propaganda Machine which seeks to ensure we all accept such invasions of privacy as the norm.

best
GoBB
 
If I am searched as part of any security procedure and my tackle is touched - so what?

Good for you but that doesn't mean that everybody HAS TO feel the same. Not everyone walks into an airport and lets any crap happen to you without questioning whether everything really is for the sake of safety only. You can do so if you wish.
 
what if you son came and said "dad I have been sexually harassed" would you say this. Your statement belittles women and men

Well, my son is a child, so as I made a clear distinction between a child experiencing this kind of thing and a grown man like Morrissey experiencing it, I guess that answers your question...

this is crappy. if itd been a woman being molested would it make a difference, or a child. letting the person get away this and just calling it messed up is letting that person harm the next person who might be in one of the categories i mentioned.

It makes a difference in this particular scenario because a child is defenseless and impressionable and still developing psychosexually. A woman is also vulnerable; not because she is "inferior" but because (usually) they are weaker than men (in a physical sense), easily overpowered, and socially are often accustomed to humiliation and degradation. So they are easily victimized. So if a woman or a child experienced this I would say something different.

But a man, a grown man, in my opinion should at worst be irritated by this experience, or angered, and deal with it in a dignified way if at all.

it seems to be typical for cases of sexual abuse that there are voices belittling what happened, trying to turn it into a joke, and those reversing the roles of perpetrator and victim, trying to tell the victim s/he has done something wrong.

I think you are reading way too much into this.

Jesus Christ, what the Hell is wrong with you???

Nobody should be subjected to unwanted sexual touching, no matter what their sex, age, or celebrity status.
I don't doubt for a minute there there are asshole perverts at these positions and that some just want to use their authority to feel up celebrities. It's totally disgusting and the people going through these searches are helpless.
If the story is true this person should be fired and charges should be pressed.
It's unacceptable behavior.

Shhh...quiet a minute. Do hear that? It's the sound of life going on.

Surely you're statistically aware that the 'Fondler' more than likely does not confine his rummaging hands to 56 year old men, right? Every instance of this kind of thing should be reported. Who is to say a woman or child wasn't next? Moz being groped isn't the end of the world, but I'm a little surprised by your naïveté regarding perpetrators.

Also -- it hardly seems Morrissey is embarrassed by it, specifically because he wrote "a f***ing diatribe on the internet about it".

You could have done a much better job taking the piss on this one without diminishing being violated.

I don't think molestation is funny and I do not think rape is funny. Both are disgusting crimes and I vote for castration of the perpetrators.

But I do think that a 56 year old homosexual man who had his junk touched for two seconds by some fruity grown man and then cries about it publicly in a missive on his fansite is a bit silly, yeah.

You should be embarrassed for making remarks like that.

And yet, I'm not. Go figure.

I'm pretty sure skylarker is a dude



Actually..If Morrissey was a woman, skylarker would have posted some feminist shit

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Airport Security have to have a valid reason for touching your dick and balls. They can't just randomly grope people, which is what Morrissey describes. And they certainly can't expect to normalise that pathological behaviour with anyone other than you. As for cavity searches, you are clutching at straws having made a fool of yourself. It is indeed sexual assault to trespass on the bodily integrity of a passenger without justification which has to be provided to any investigation. Given that Morrissey didn't trigger any technological alarms there is a clear case for the Security agent to provide an explanation and rationalisation for his decision to trespass on Morrissey's bodily integrity. You are a useful idiot and part of the Panopticon Propaganda Machine which seeks to ensure we all accept such invasions of privacy as the norm.

best
GoBB
All of this hinges on the supposition that the 'CrankFraud' is being truthful - something you spend hoooouuurrrrs (rolls eyes etc) telling everyone he isn't. So if you've bought in to it... Welcome to the cult.
The hypocrisy of your comments is the real foolishness. Not to mention having to be right simply as you butt in to sound authoritative.
I look forward to the utterly vegan borefest (which apparently will be meat free) that will be your finely crafted, tiresome reply. Universal ignore engaged.
Lulz, emphasis on the zzzzz.
 
Im sorry skylarker but using because women are usually weaker is complete f***ing irrelevance, it is not ok what the person did to morrissey, he does not have to sit in a corner and go fair enough im a man, i'll just 'man up'.
 
All of this hinges on the supposition that the 'CrankFraud' is being truthful - something you spend hoooouuurrrrs (rolls eyes etc) telling everyone he isn't. So if you've bought in to it... Welcome to the cult.
The hypocrisy of your comments is the real foolishness. Not to mention having to be right simply as you butt in to sound authoritative.
I look forward to the utterly vegan borefest (which apparently will be meat free) that will be your finely crafted, tiresome reply. Universal ignore engaged.
Lulz, emphasis on the zzzzz.

So provide me an answer. How far is too far? What do you let people do to you and your body and what not? Everyone has their own limit. You seem to be willing to let a lot of things happen to you in the name of safety. I'm not willing, I'm just not.
 
So taking getting a full body scan isn't enough?! What is the point of the full body scanners if they can't detect foreign objects?
 
Back
Top Bottom