"Obviously after an interview" .. just had to slip that in there! Wouldn't be a Morrissey-Solo front page article without something trying to take the shine off anything positive, no matter how minute. A subtle little hint that the only reason the album got the number 1 spot was that the author was fishing for an interview. Nice job adding that comment to the rest of the story David T. Of course anyone could make that comment in the comments section, but its promoted to the top/main article.
It's small fry, but its funny seeing the agenda at work still!
I was just going to include the link but then saw that several people had replied to the comment by the original poster so I felt it best to leave it in. With the way the story promotion works, the comments would be confusing if the context of the original comment was removed.
I'm talking about the comments that already exist and are attached to the story.
I know you are, but that is an extremely poor excuse. You know it's not confusing. I don't see anyone having discussion based on that which would suddenly look strange if the comment were not there.
Well I think we have a difference of opinion.
If you go to the main page article:
And read the first comment that shows up:
It doesn't make sense if the context of the original comment were removed. Also, I wouldn't have recalled there was an interview. Perhaps there is an agenda on the Louder Than War side? Perhaps not, it's up to the individual to make up their mind.
No, there's an agenda from yourself and other cronies haha
What does the first comment have to do with anything? That comment is based on the album, I don't think it has anything to do with the comment implying the only reason the album got number 1 was that the author was fishing for an interview. You're trying to create context that isn't even there to justify trying to put a negative spin on things, no matter how small or subtle. It's just amusing more than anything else watching you operate.
The first comment was based on the content of the original poster's post, that you want censored.
I wouldn't have personally included that comment if I had found the link and posted it but the original poster did. You can criticize them for their words, but don't turn it around as the site's 'agenda', take a look at who is actually responsible.
So you're telling me that if "Obviously after an interview?" was removed, that no one would have a clue what "itll be a lost classic" would mean?
No I'm not criticising the original poster, I'm criticising you for adding it to the main page because you like the negative connotation it carries. They added their 2 cents on the article, which would be fine as part of the comments section, but it was your decision to advertise it on the main page because it suits your agenda.