I can't say I'm thrilled with the title. His titles are usually quite unique. I here's to hoping for great songs.
If you didn't like his book, you simply are not a fan. National fron disco is crap? Hmm, I see...
Blue Rose hidden in the title?
The book fabrication it's an act you stupid twat. Most of it isn't true. It's everything Morrissey isn't in someways.
The written word is different to what's sung though. Morrissey's greatest strength is probably expression rather than his writing. His words are great but he expresses his emotions in song probably better than anyone else. I like the book but if you're not an avid reader it could be a bit heavy.
I found the autobiography very honest and true. You found it horrible and you're defending it by saying that "book fabrication it's an act?". Really?... Stay in this fansite, cursing everything he does and everyone who happens to like it.
It has nothing to do with being an avid reader. I'm a big reader and did not find the book 'heavy' in the slightest. It was enjoyable but totally lopsided and wrecked my head with the everlasting whining about the court case. Judge Weeks gets 60 pages while The Smiths scrapes by on 10 or 20 pages. Moz needed an editor to say: 'I love your style but this is not an autobiography. It is a rant. Please don't waste this opportunity to reward your fans with insights and 'new' news.' But of course this didn't happen. Same way Visconti produced that ridiculous in-studio recording session of the new tracks (as shown on Moz 25 blu ray which I bought) and said 'that sounded great' instead of telling the truth and saying 'what is wrong with you? Ditch that God forsaken useless band and get some decent songwriters and bring back Alain quick'. But that won't happen because the sychophantic slags are too busy being real 'fans'. I hope to be proven wrong with the new album and welcome that day with open ears.
Er, yes!
It has nothing to do with being an avid reader. I'm a big reader and did not find the book 'heavy' in the slightest. It was enjoyable but totally lopsided and wrecked my head with the everlasting whining about the court case. Judge Weeks gets 60 pages while The Smiths scrapes by on 10 or 20 pages. Moz needed an editor to say: 'I love your style but this is not an autobiography. It is a rant. Please don't waste this opportunity to reward your fans with insights and 'new' news.' But of course this didn't happen. Same way Visconti produced that ridiculous in-studio recording session of the new tracks (as shown on Moz 25 blu ray which I bought) and said 'that sounded great' instead of telling the truth and saying 'what is wrong with you? Ditch that God forsaken useless band and get some decent songwriters and bring back Alain quick'. But that won't happen because the sychophantic slags are too busy being real 'fans'. I hope to be proven wrong with the new album and welcome that day with open ears.
Morrissey could call his new album 'I Done a Big Ploppy Poop in My Pants' for all I care. All that matters is the quality of the songs - the album title is irrelevant.
Hmm. How are they more precise than the rest of the species?
Scandinavia, Istanbul etc don't fill me with much hope
I don't think the title is bad at all, actually I am growing to quite like it
what I don't like is that it paves the way for 'People Are The Same Everywhere' to be lead single
songs were first aired in 2011 surely hes got more in his locker !?!
Art-Hounds & Action should be on the album, everything else isn't going to get any better so B-side status
Scandinavia, Istanbul etc don't fill me with much hope
yeah, right on brother- - - Updated - - -
No no, we are just more literal-minded. It comes from a widespread discouragement of imagination, and most of all a dislike of communicative ambiguity, which is considered somehow unfair.
He could never have received a fair trial from a judge appointed by Thatcher. If his lawyers didn't tell him that, then shame on them (shame is the name.)
Did you miss the part of the book where Alain tells Moz he knows who's planning his downfall, but it was not him?