If 'Prince' William Were Black ... - true-to-you.net (March 17, 2016)

From Morrissey-solo Wiki
Revision as of 15:57, 27 March 2022 by Famous when dead (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Morrissey Statement Category:true-to-you.net Statement ==Summary== ==Statement== <blockquote> Additionally, if 'Prince' William had endorsed shooting and kil...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Summary

Statement

Additionally, if 'Prince' William had endorsed shooting and killing this week, as he has, but 'just happened' to be black, not only would the media blast him to oblivion, but he would also be arrested and would have his many, many firearms confiscated. Obviously gun laws only exist in order to enforce upon people who are poor.

Secondly, William The Terrible laments the fact that many species will be wiped out by the time his daughter is 25 (by which he means 'she will have nothing to kill'), yet he is too dense to realize that species are mainly being wiped out by people such as himself and his even-dimmer brother.

William laments on behalf of his daughter, yet he doesn't understand that all of the animals that he kills for fun are also daughters and sons and parents.

William The Terrible refers to 'trophy hunting' as if this were 1907. There is no longer any such thing as 'trophy hunting'. It is as obsolete as the notion of a family that could possibly be considered royal.

William, why endorse the killing of anything? What is it about you that cannot survive without killing?

William.jpg

Archived original post here.