It's International Womens day or something

[Uncleskinny]

Re: huh

Censoring posts / threads ?
Moderators haven't removed any posts of Mclenarr.

Morrissey-Solo is one of the most linient sites you've ever been to.

^^this^^ - can you point out the posts you think have been censored?

Peter

 

[Mclenarr]

Re: huh

Censoring posts / threads ?
Moderators haven't removed any posts of Mclenarr.


That's because you want to give me enough rope...j/k





Morrissey-Solo is one of the most linient sites you've ever been to.

This is very true and I appreciate it!

 

[Superhans]

Re: huh

Moving them, moderators telling a user they wish he'd leave because they don't like his posts, bit out of order.

No it isn't! In fact it's the least lenient site I've joined by miles.

 

[Kewpie]

Re: huh

Moving them, moderators telling a user they wish he'd leave because they don't like his posts, bit out of order.

No it isn't! In fact it's the least lenient site I've joined by miles.

If a user posted a thread in an unappropreate forum, a moderator will move it to the appropreate one.

It's not a censorship, just moderating the forums.

Can you give us examples of other lenient sites?

 

[Mclenarr]

Re: huh

Moving them, moderators telling a user they wish he'd leave because they don't like his posts, bit out of order.

blurggghh

 

[*EqualOpportunityHater*]

I'm not kissing ass or anything, but solo is actually pretty good with freedom of speech, liberty, etc...

I post at two other sites unrelated to this here... and they are total extremes...
One is very popular, HIGHLY moderated and watched.. it's like the motherf***ing gestapo there, I been lucky and have gotten away with tons of shit, but hundreds of others have suffered very sad/tragic deaths lol... The other site is HUGE and has no real moderating.. the admis/mods let you get away with pretty much anything.... it's like the Pigsty x 10 <333

So, solo is in the middle for me and it's pretty ok here despite the occasionl drama

 

[Uncleskinny]

Re: huh

Moving them, moderators telling a user they wish he'd leave because they don't like his posts, bit out of order.

No it isn't! In fact it's the least lenient site I've joined by miles.

So, where's this censorship you mentioned? Can you provide examples of censorship?

Peter

 

[troubleluvsme]

Moving them, moderators telling a user they wish he'd leave because they don't like his posts, bit out of order.

No it isn't! In fact it's the least lenient site I've joined by miles.

Fee free to go back to one of those sites then.

Seriously.

 

[Superhans]

Re: huh

So, where's this censorship you mentioned? Can you provide examples of censorship?

Peter

People being banned/warned for swearing. I have never in my life seen that before on a forum. I've been to forums where swear words are automatically altered to things like 'c**t', but you can always but a in these, for example and nobody has this post edited, deleted or are giving warnings for doing such a thing.

 

[Superhans]

Fee free to go back to one of those sites then.

Seriously.

I still visit them.

Rumour has it that you're actually able to post on more than one Internet site! Crazy I know!

 

[Uncleskinny]

Re: huh

People being banned/warned for swearing. I have never in my life seen that before on a forum. I've been to forums where swear words are automatically altered to things like 'c**t', but you can always but a in these, for example and nobody has this post edited, deleted or are giving warnings for doing such a thing.

That's not censorship. Censorship would me me editing your post to take out bits I disagreed with. You may not think so, but as far as I can remember, we have never censored anything apart from posted and re-posted porn, and personal information posted without permission.

Peter

 

[Superhans]

Re: huh

That's not censorship. Censorship would me me editing your post to take out bits I disagreed with. You may not think so, but as far as I can remember, we have never censored anything apart from posted and re-posted porn, and personal information posted without permission.

Peter

You are censoring my ability to fully express myself. So many bannings and that, it makes people terrified to say what they think. It's like 1930s Russia.

 

[someofusisturningnasty]

Fee free to go back to one of those sites then.

Seriously.

Actually I'd rather he stayed. He's not part of some of these pathetic, self-congratulatory cliques that exist on this site which makes him approx. 2789 times more interesting than most other people here.

 

[Mclenarr]

Re: huh

You are censoring my ability to fully express myself. So many bannings and that, it makes people terrified to say what they think. It's like 1930s Russia.

Thanks for the entertainment!!

 

[Uncleskinny]

Re: huh

You are censoring my ability to fully express myself. So many bannings and that, it makes people terrified to say what they think. It's like 1930s Russia.

If expressing yourself fully means posting porn and other people's personal information, then yes, I am censoring you. I wouldn't take your analogy any further if I were you, or you'd be in danger of invoking Godwin's Law.

Peter

 

[Mclenarr]

Re: huh

If expressing yourself fully means posting porn and other people's personal information, then yes, I am censoring you. I wouldn't take your analogy any further if I were you, or you'd be in danger of invoking Godwin's Law.

Peter

I don't know if anyone else didn't know but if you didn't know
This is from the wiki


References to Godwin's Law often actually refer to a corollary of it which determines that the person who first makes an unwarranted reference to Nazi Germany or Hitler in an argument loses that argument automatically. It also can apply when someone compares internet forum moderators to '1930's Russia' as done by that dickwad in the Morrissey solo forum called superhans.


Gee! Wikipedia's getting mighty efficient on their updates thesedays, not to mention rather personal!!!

 

[snowfallsoon]

I'll be doing the dishes and all the cooking for my wife today (I don't have a wife)

Heh...

 

[Superhans]

Re: huh

I don't know if anyone else didn't know but if you didn't know
This is from the wiki


References to Godwin's Law often actually refer to a corollary of it which determines that the person who first makes an unwarranted reference to Nazi Germany or Hitler in an argument loses that argument automatically. It also can apply when someone compares internet forum moderators to '1930's Russia' as done by that dickwad in the Morrissey solo forum called superhans.


Gee! Wikipedia's getting mighty efficient on their updates thesedays, not to mention rather personal!!!

Look at this sad sap desperately trying to suck up to the senior members on this forum.

 

[Mclenarr]

Re: huh

Look at this sad sap desperately trying to suck up to the senior members on this forum.

I knew you was going to say that!!!

 

[Jukebox Jury]

Heh...

That reminds me, I better telephone an international women today then and congratualte her

Jukebox Jury