It’s not about politics

Verso said:
Yes, bhops. Someone who “doesn’t give two shits” spends 24 hours a day on a forum where he religiously downvotes all the posts made by people he doesn’t like.
Click to expand...
Maybe he's just trolling you, has that ever occurred to you?
 
ForgotHowIGotMyName said:
To be fair, I am a fascist.

The problem with Nerak calling people fascists is that a) she doesn't understand what fascism is (most people don't) and b) she thinks that calling something "fascist" is an argument.

The funny thing about Nerak is that she claims to be a anti-establishment Marxist socialist. But she is so obsessed with owning the right-wingers that she will frequently make pro-establishment and pro-corporation arguments to try to do so.

Take this:



Like what is the implication of this post?
So she doesn't what you getting your news and commentary from internet personalities. OK, then where? Well, the only alternative is to get it from corporate-owned sources. She is literally arguing FOR the corporations and AGAINST citizen journalists.
Click to expand...

I thought I was on ignore?

I do know what the definition of fascist is - you would be better described as a wee fanny on the internet.

The 'citizen journalists' are part of the world's biggest corporations.

The alternative is to get your news from a wide variety of sources, legacy, social etc & learn how verify & analyse.
 
IMG_20210308_174423.jpg
 
Born to Harangue said:
How about people posting dancing gifs of politicians who a few months later approve drone strikes that kill 22 people? What are your thoughts about that? I'm sure you're not lost for words as you've subjected us to your thoughts nearly 10,000 times (20 times per day) on all manner of dilettantish 'twee' speciousness over the past 18 months. We even got a couple of dozen posts from you about Jody or whatever her name was, a yoga teacher who called into a radio show who for the flimsiest of reasons you thought might be reelfountain. And yet we can't extract one word from you about the militaristic politicians whose electoral victory you were celebrating only four months ago (the same goes for Radis "I once stood next to David Sylvian" Noir who responded to my post on this subject the other day with 200 words entirely unrelated to what I had written --- then he accuses others of whataboutery).

When there's something of actual relevance to contribute, to clarify and expand upon something that people might actually be interested in for once, you blend into the background and can't be reached for comment. You don't get to distract from your own pathetic conduct by referring continuously to "fascists". That's a cop out. Imagine if you guys spent as much time working on your own unpleasant traits and personality deficiencies as you do in opposing 'fascists' online (this includes that hyper-aggressive one dimensional pseud Verso) the world could be your oyster :lbf::lbf:
Okay, maybe that's expecting too much from you lot, you've already shown us all that you're capable of and this is about as good as it gets. Enjoy treating everyone to another combined 15,000 posts on this website over the next 12 months or so; world beating stuff. You have fascism on the ropes, forcing it to absorb stiff body blows. I can't wait for the next cliffsnotes explanation of the works of Heidegger; I expect we'll get that long before we get any introspection from nerak or Radis regarding their Biden/Harris fangirling.



View attachment 69413
Click to expand...

Once again you have forgotten that not only is brevity the soul of wit, but it also helps to have some wit, or least more than the half you currently have.
 
crotty32 said:
Again I may be ignorant but if the armed police had shot and killed the man after he ignored their orders would they be within their "rights"?
Click to expand...
Yes you may be ignorant, but I don't know. That's really beside the point and so are any hypotheticals you may dream up. If a person is murdered and then shown to have drugs in their system that would be enough to potentially kill most people that doesn't negate the fact that they were murdered.
 
Radis Noir said:
Once again you have forgotten that not only is brevity the soul of wit, but it also helps to have some wit, or least more than the half you currently have.
Click to expand...

Thank you for this quote about brevity from Shakespeare's longest play; the only play of his that has more than 30,000 words. I doubt you've ever read it, if you can't even manage to get through two short paragraphs of text on a forum without complaining. I'm reminded of the time you quoted Samuel Johnson out of context and I had to explain to you that the quote ("patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel") didn't mean what you thought it meant. It helps if you have some familiarity with the context in which a statement was made or with a text before you rip a line or two from it and think you've scored a knockout blow with it.

"Brevity is the soul of wit" being in Hamlet doesn't make it a golden rule of life. Just because a sentence once appeared in a work of fiction and became a common phrase uttered by people attempting to appear intelligent doesn't mean it's something we all have to live by; Shakespeare didn't live by it himself. But what would you know. Nerak's fardel of posts on this forum over the past 18 months are equivalent in length to at least four Hamlet's, with wit never being of primary concern, but because you agree with her on the majority of topics you don't send her any of your out of context quotes/cliches to try to shut down her prolixity. Because you're a scoundrel and ideologue aghast that anyone holds opposing views as it disrupts your safe peaceable world where you allow your media and government to do your thinking for you and expect everyone else to follow suit.
 
Last edited:
Born to Harangue said:
Thank you for this quote about brevity from Shakespeare's longest play; the only play of his that has more than 30,000 words. I doubt you've ever read it, if you can't even manage to get through two short paragraphs of text on a forum without complaining. I'm reminded of the time you quoted Samuel Johnson out of context and I had to explain to you that the quote ("patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel") didn't mean what you thought it meant. It helps if you have some familiarity with the context in which a statement was made or with a text before you rip a line or two from it and think you've scored a knockout blow with it.

"Brevity is the soul of wit" being in Hamlet doesn't make it a golden rule of life. Just because a sentence once appeared in a work of fiction and became a common phrase uttered by people attempting to appear intelligent doesn't mean it's something we all have to live by; Shakespeare didn't live by it himself. But what would you know. Nerak's fardel of posts on this forum over the past 18 months are equivalent in length to at least four Hamlet's, with wit never being of primary concern, but because you agree with her on the majority of topics you don't send her any of your out of context quotes or your cliches to try to shut down her prolixity. Because you're a scoundrel and ideologue aghast that anyone holds opposing views as it disrupts your safe peaceable world where you allow your media and government to do your thinking for you and expect everyone else to follow suit.
Click to expand...
I think half-wit was over-estimating things.
 
Radis Noir said:
I think half-wit was over-estimating things.
Click to expand...

For you, yes. I know you didn't even read it because I posted it, bent down on the floor to plug in my charger, looked at my phone again and you had already replied. You're extremely lazy and have a habit of ducking out when more than a couple of minutes of thought is expected from you. Maybe you just like to let your government and media do your thinking for you because you're such a slouch who can't be bothered to put any effort into anything.
 
Born to Harangue said:
Thank you for this quote about brevity from Shakespeare's longest play; the only play of his that has more than 30,000 words. I doubt you've ever read it, if you can't even manage to get through two short paragraphs of text on a forum without complaining. I'm reminded of the time you quoted Samuel Johnson out of context and I had to explain to you that the quote ("patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel") didn't mean what you thought it meant. It helps if you have some familiarity with the context in which a statement was made or with a text before you rip a line or two from it and think you've scored a knockout blow with it.

"Brevity is the soul of wit" being in Hamlet doesn't make it a golden rule of life. Just because a sentence once appeared in a work of fiction and became a common phrase uttered by people attempting to appear intelligent doesn't mean it's something we all have to live by; Shakespeare didn't live by it himself. But what would you know. Nerak's fardel of posts on this forum over the past 18 months are equivalent in length to at least four Hamlet's, with wit never being of primary concern, but because you agree with her on the majority of topics you don't send her any of your out of context quotes or your cliches to try to shut down her prolixity. Because you're a scoundrel and ideologue aghast that anyone holds opposing views as it disrupts your safe peaceable world where you allow your media and government to do your thinking for you and expect everyone else to follow suit.
Click to expand...
You're going to lob the exhaustingly-dull accusation of blind hegemonic loyalty at someone and then bemoan the usage of cliché in the same breath, huh?
 
Born to Harangue said:
For you, yes. I know you didn't even read it because I posted it, bent down on the floor to plug in my charger, looked at my phone again and you had already replied. You're extremely lazy and have a habit of ducking out when more than a couple of minutes of thought is expected from you. Maybe you just like to let your government and media do your thinking for you because you're such a slouch who can't be bothered to put any effort into anything.
Click to expand...

Oh I read it. Unsurprisingly it said very little. You might think that your prolixity hides the fact that you have very little of interest to say but it doesn't - it emphasises the fact. I did enjoy the bit about taking things out of context though, but not in a way that you would like.
 
Verso said:
You're going to lob the exhaustingly-dull accusation of blind hegemonic loyalty at someone and then bemoan the usage of cliché in the same breath, huh?
Click to expand...

You bemoan hegemonic loyalty all the time so if you want to admit you're a walking cliché that's fine with me.

"To be fair, you reactionary retards blur together quite easily. I'd hardly call you "separate."" - you, yesterday, making exhaustingly dull accusations. The constant use of "retard" is so edgy by the way. I don't consider "accusations of hegemonic loyalty" in and of itself to be a cliché, but if you do then take it up with Radis and nerak who have called people fascists and nazis dozens of times between them. If it's a pet peeve of yours that's where you can start, unless you're just another scoundrel and ideologue who lets things slip by when they're said by people whose opinions you generally agree with. Not that I believe for one second that you like Radis or nerak, but you realize there's strength in numbers and you need a couple of lackeys to upvote your posts so you don't get swamped by the 'fascists'. It probably kills you to have to stay in their good graces, because you're a sociopath as Travis pointed out, but it's for the greater good since you're gonna need someone on your side.

As my post already made clear enough the clichés I was talking about (reusing specific quotes that have already been done to death), I'm not going to go back over it with you just because you've decided you want to insert yourself into the conversation and jump to Radis' defence since he needs all the help he can get. Benevolent of you to do that for him, though. I'm sure it will pay dividends the next time you require backup and ':ROFLMAO:' reactions from him.

Radis Noir said:
Oh I read it. Unsurprisingly it said very little. You might think that your prolixity hides the fact that you have very little of interest to say but it doesn't - it emphasises the fact. I did enjoy the bit about taking things out of context though, but not in a way that you would like.
Click to expand...

It can't possibly have said less than what you said in this post: "I read your post, it didn't say very much, I liked the bit at the end but not for reasons you would like and I'm not going to expand further." Thanks for coming.
 
Last edited:
this is true these mediocre skinny cucks upvote each others ignorant troll posts
🤒
they grab quotes out of context and glom them together so the readership thinks that they are rocket astronauts👨‍🚀

o_O
 
Born to Harangue said:
I don't consider "accusations of hegemonic loyalty" in and of itself to be a cliché, but if you do then take it up with Radis and nerak who have called people fascists and nazis dozens of times between them. If it's a pet peeve of yours that's where you can start, unless you're just another scoundrel and ideologue who lets things slip by when they're said by people whose opinions you generally agree with. Not that I believe for one second that you like Radis or nerak, but you realize there's strength in numbers and you need a couple of lackeys to upvote your posts so you don't get swamped by the 'fascists'. It probably kills you to have to stay in their good graces, because you're a sociopath as Travis pointed out, but it's for the greater good since you're gonna need someone on your side.
Click to expand...
Oh, you don't? How convenient. People like you, like reelfountain, like Hovis... all you ever seem to do is accuse everyone who disagrees with you that they get all of their news from the mainstream media, that they have some sort of blind loyalty towards their government, that they're happily willing to toe the line. The implication, of course, is that you guys can see through it all, you guys know the real truth and the way things really are. It's a tired trope and one made all the more amusing in this case for the fact that you don't see it.

Born to Harangue said:
As my post already made clear enough the clichés I was talking about (reusing specific quotes that have already been done to death), I'm not going to go back over it with you just because you've decided you want to insert yourself into the conversation and jump to Radis' defence since he needs all the help he can get. Benevolent of you to do that for him, though. I'm sure it will pay dividends the next time you require backup and ':ROFLMAO:' reactions from him.
Click to expand...
There is absolutely no one on this forum who cares more about the economy of likes, dislikes and emoji reactions than you. This half-assed nonchalance routine doesn't work on me; it's obvious how deeply obsessed you are with the politics of this messageboard. You were banned and still insist on hanging around.
 
Verso said:
Oh, you don't? How convenient. People like you, like reelfountain, like Hovis... all you ever seem to do is accuse everyone who disagrees with you that they get all of their news from the mainstream media, that they have some sort of blind loyalty towards their government, that they're happily willing to toe the line. The implication, of course, is that you guys can see through it all, you guys know the real truth and the way things really are. It's a tired trope and one made all the more amusing in this case for the fact that you don't see it.


There is absolutely no one on this forum who cares more about the economy of likes, dislikes and emoji reactions than you. This half-assed nonchalance routine doesn't work on me; it's obvious how deeply obsessed you are with the politics of this messageboard. You were banned and still insist on hanging around.
Click to expand...

👨‍🚀
WTF are you talking about BGVelcro? the economy of likes dislikes and emoji??? WTF is an economy of likes, dislikes and emojis??
"the IMPLICATION is of course that you see but dont see." Another master of implications like FC:blushing:
 

Similar threads

D
Tell us about the last film you watched, pt 2
22 23 24
Replies
478
Views
26K
Tea with the taste
Tea with the taste
goinghome
"I am an animal" - Nature Notes
10 11 12
Replies
239
Views
18K
goinghome
goinghome
V
There is nothing inherently wrong with paedophilia
2 3
Replies
55
Views
14K
Skylarker
Skylarker
Back
Top Bottom