This is a pretty accurate summation. The main issues are the separation wall, primarily that is is being built well WITHIN palestinian territory, and not along the border on the Israeli side, as it was actually originally intended. Someone earlier made a very apt comparison to Bloody Sunday and the IRA in Northern Ireland, as you were saying, Israel's extreme military policies are fueling terrorism instead of stopping it. Another great parallel would be our own governments' incredibly shortsighted and violent forays into the middle east which have demonstratably INCREASED terrorism, and sympathy for those that commit it. The Arab league has said they would gladly deal with Israel if they will pull back to 1967 borders, even Hamas has hinted as much. Peace is POSSIBLE, the will just isn't there. This elucidates a greater issue, though. The United states plays an enormous role in this issue, and supports the most violent and radical military policies, as well as providing a shield from international justice. This does somewhat hurt the position of those Americans here who tend to hold more pro-palestinian views, as how can we say Morrissey shouldn't go when our own government at home is playing a very direct part in these inhumane policies. Also, would not morrissey be equally compelled by that reasoning, to boycott the United States for our Iraq occupation?
Yes, thank you for mentioning this particular 400-mile long monstrosity, or as it’s been called an ‘Apartheid Wall’. Supporters argue that the barrier is a necessary tool protecting Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism, including suicide bombing attacks.
Opponents argue that the barrier is an illegal attempt to annex Palestinian land under the guise of security, that it violates international law (the Red Cross has declared the barrier in violation of the Geneva Convention), and has the intent or effect to disrupt final status negotiations for a viable Palestine state.
It also severely restricts Palestinians who live nearby, particularly their ability to travel freely within the West Bank and to access work in Israel, thereby undermining their economy.
Upon completion of the construction the barrier would prevent over 130,000 Palestinian children from being immunised, and deny more than 100,000 pregnant women access to healthcare in Israel. In addition, almost a third of West Bank villages will suffer from lack of access to healthcare, including emergency care.
It has been suggested that popular support for Hamas is due to the very fact that they have established much needed hospitals, education systems, libraries and social services.
‘As of May 2004, the fence construction had already uprooted an estimated 102,320 Palestinian olive and citrus trees, demolished 75 acres (0.3 km²) of greenhouses and 23 miles (37 km) of irrigation pipes.’
‘It is difficult to overstate the humanitarian impact of the Barrier. The route inside the West Bank severs communities, people’s access to services, livelihoods and religious and cultural amenities. In addition, plans for the Barrier’s exact route and crossing points through it are often not fully revealed until days before construction commences. This has led to considerable anxiety amongst Palestinians about how their future lives will be impacted. The land between the Barrier and the Green Line constitutes some of the most fertile in the West Bank. It is currently the home for 49,400 West Bank Palestinians living in 38 villages and towns.’
- Introduction UN report 2005
Even George Bush had the 'sense' to acknowledge that the barrier wasn't exactly helping relations!:
'I think the wall is a problem. And I discussed this with Ariel Sharon. It is very difficult to develop confidence between the Palestinians and Israel with a wall snaking through the West Bank.'