Charlie Cheswick
Well-Known Member
It's because he's got a big gob on him.
Someone already mentioned why Moz has difficulties of finding a deal (can't remember who it was. Jennifer Ivory?). It's because today record companies offer mostly this http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/360_deal. And Moz doesn't want that. I don't blame him. I wouldn't want such a deal either.
He doesn't have a record deal because he doesn't want to do the things that sell records. While we will be a couple different copies of an album he still doesn't sell much. If he sold as many albums as he did when he made his comeback he'd likely have a deal without a doubt. But he won't promote, won't do interviews on television. Why should they give him money if he won't play ball.
Why is this? He was on Johnathan Ross in 2004 or whatever and did TV interviews for ROTT. What was with the sudden refusal of TV interviews? Copying Bowie? What gives?
Why is this? He was on Johnathan Ross in 2004 or whatever and did TV interviews for ROTT. What was with the sudden refusal of TV interviews? Copying Bowie? What gives?
They do support the artist more financially in the 360 deal, but they do take a increasing chunk of their cash. I guess its a great deal if you are a megastar whos celebrity status is the main money factor
But you have to be the record companys bitch for the deal's duration
Maybe he just got tired of it. Tired of explaning himself and his music to a tv audience which the majority of don't know him or care and the rest are just wainting for some lowbrow smutty joke, stricly or made in Chelsea to start.He seemed to be more open to giving interviews and doing TV performances even in 2013. What happened? I fear he will become another Bowie, but then again he couldn't live without the attention.
Perhaps there will be a late night show appearance while he's in NYC?
He will never lose the natural promotion that is his looks
He will never lose the natural promotion that is his looks
Did you see him in the kmal vid. phroww..... Only thing good about the vid. Nice piece of Manchester a**
he hasn't aged well at all tho. I love him, but some of his fans are so delusional. Tbh, none of The Smiths has aged well in my opinion
I still say when he lets his hair go white-grey it adds ten years to his age.
Hell, even if he just died his eyebrows it would take a couple years off.
When he had the dark brown-black (dyed) hair in the early 2000s with the long sideburns he looked great. He looked like he was in his late 30s when he had already passed 40. But now with the whiteish hair I just find it ages him ridiculously. Even the fact that on stage when white hair catches the light it often looks wispy and thin whereas hair with colour just looks fuller and healthier.
Anyway, I'm not saying he'd get a record deal if he died his hair but I do think it's relevant to his lack of appearances on TV etc. He doesn't seem to like being photographed or anything much these days and uses a lot of old photos, so he can't be totally happy with his appearance (not that he looks bad because he doesn't, but he does look undeniably old and that isn't ideally marketable).
I still say when he lets his hair go white-grey it adds ten years to his age.
Hell, even if he just died his eyebrows it would take a couple years off.
When he had the dark brown-black (dyed) hair in the early 2000s with the long sideburns he looked great. He looked like he was in his late 30s when he had already passed 40. But now with the whiteish hair I just find it ages him ridiculously. Even the fact that on stage when white hair catches the light it often looks wispy and thin whereas hair with colour just looks fuller and healthier.
Anyway, I'm not saying he'd get a record deal if he died his hair but I do think it's relevant to his lack of appearances on TV etc. He doesn't seem to like being photographed or anything much these days and uses a lot of old photos, so he can't be totally happy with his appearance (not that he looks bad because he doesn't, but he does look undeniably old and that isn't ideally marketable).