Related items:
Last edited by a moderator:
I understand your point. But it's a bit like Moz and his badge, and those who shun his work because of it. Finkelstein shares my opinions in some things not others. I feel he's worth reading because of his expert knowledge on the H Industry. His detractors call him all sorts of names because of his outing of their industry. He supports the Palestinians and sees them as the victims in the Israel/Palestine war and sees Israel as an illegal state founded on terrorism. People have different views on both.
I can see the bad acts of both sides. For example the Jerusalem King David Hotel bombing in '46 was an attack carried out by the Zionists against the British who were occupying the area at the time. 91 people were killed including 28 British citizens. Two years later Britain handed over Palestine so the Jews could create Israel. The whole subject is very murky.
I know.
Assimilation is their enemy. Take away the H and anti-Semitism and they wouldn't have an identity.
Go back and read it fool. Educate yourself.
Did you just type that? Did you? A paedophile who looks younger than he is is to be somehow excused for abusing young boys aged 13, 14 and 15?
You miss the point of fact - as always - in law this is paedophilia - regardless of your views. Your assumption that MI5 made all of this up - prove it.
You previously claimed you didn't paint him as a victim but ... have once again painted him as a victim.
Contrarian and outed paedophile sympathiser.
Reelfountain had made some provocative and hateful statements in this and the preceeding For Britain post. She has attempted to distance herself from some comments, ignored and excused others and denied even saying some things.
Below are some of the comments Reelfountain made in the preceeding thread - they (and lots more) remain available.
In regards to young black men (not white. young men) she was very specific.
"Other nations would throw these lowlifes into fetid cell blocks to rot" Only today she claimed she never called black men lowlifes. She will no doubt claim this is out of context. In which context is it acceptable?
"Re: Jack Renshaw. Young, gay and in the closet. Another confused young man. Another target for MI5". She goes on to claim that the abused boy was 15 - as if that's ok but the boys were actually 13, 14 and 15. Apparently Jack was a victim of his own sexuality. It was all a conspiracy against poor Jack. Well, that's alright then.
Further support for Renshaw ...
" Imagine being jailed for life for mouthing off to your mates down the local Wetherspoons" No mention of the attempted murder of an MP. How convenient.
Reelfountain claims ...
"You constantly confuse my opinions of anti-engineered mass migration with racism".
And then states ....
"The Muslims who pick up vulnerable white girls in their Audis and BMWs are laughing at us".
Sadly, I don't have time to access quotes for a full character assasination. Perhaps tomorrow?
The above is merely a taster of the consistently racist and hate-filled commentary spewed by Reelfountain.
Take away my hatred and I wouldn't have an identity.
Thanks Stephen for this video. I just finished watching it. They covered a lot of topics I've posted about up here and many more. Never heard of either of those guys before but I'll definitely check more of MWs stuff out. Interesting about the Anglican Church. And how normal views are shouted down and misunderstood as 'hateful' by the modern cretinous left.. So much common sense all throughout. We must celebrate our extinction!Looks interesting - I definitely will watch it tomorrow. Thanks.
Isn't 'f*** You' hate speech?I cannot believe the tin foil hat, conspiracy theory swallowing right wing bullshit being posted in this website. It’s embarrassing. This website is now a conduit for dangerous hate speech.
f*** You.
In the future governing Cabinet of Anne Marie Waters I will be Education Secretary.If you're the litmus for education, no thanks.
Never have I called all black men lowlifes.
Isn't 'f*** You' hate speech?
In the future governing Cabinet of Anne Marie Waters I will be Education Secretary.
Suck on that.
Thanks Stephen for this video. I just finished watching it. They covered a lot of topics I've posted about up here and many more. Never heard of either of those guys before but I'll definitely check more of MWs stuff out. Interesting about the Anglican Church. And how normal views are shouted down and misunderstood as 'hateful' by the modern cretinous left.. So much common sense all throughout. We must celebrate our extinction!
In the future governing Cabinet of Anne Marie Waters I will be Education Secretary.
Suck on that.
I never retract the things I actually say. I know you are mentally-handicapped but again, for the third time now, I will re-announce that black gangbangers who stab people are indeed lowlife. But never did I say black men were lowlife (which could presumably mean all black men). A bit of a difference there I'd say.Nobody said you did you dullard. For f*** sake read before responding with those hateful, twitchy fingers of yours.
But you do admit to calling black men lowlifes after denying it. Why then the staunch denial prior to your quote reappearing? This was yet another ill conceived, generalised comment asserting
that not only are young black men lowlifes that they are criminals to boot. If this was not your original intention you failed. If you fail to write clearly expect to be misunderstood.
However, a quick glance at your other posts suggests that your initial post was racially motivated - despite your forced attempt at retraction.
Isn't 'f*** You' hate speech?
Nobody said you did you dullard. For f*** sake read before responding with those hateful, twitchy fingers of yours.
But you do admit to calling black men lowlifes after denying it. Why then the staunch denial prior to your quote reappearing? This was yet another ill conceived, generalised comment asserting
that not only are young black men lowlifes that they are criminals to boot. If this was not your original intention you failed. If you fail to write clearly expect to be misunderstood.
However, a quick glance at your other posts suggests that your initial post was racially motivated - despite your forced attempt at retraction.
This was yet another ill conceived, generalised comment asserting
that not only are young black men lowlifes that they are criminals to boot.