The Truth
about Ruth
I'm sorry but my opinion is that when you use phrases like "fairly well acknowledged" that don't mean anything you don't create a strong argument. It's literally meaningless. Who are these people that acknowledge this belief? If a belief is "fairly well acknowledged" does that have any bearing on the veracity of this belief? I understand this is not a prepared statement you're officially submitting. I also am not commenting on the content of the message as that isn't the point. First sentence uses the word "when" twice unnecessarily. Also, when you say "the Jews" you're not helping yourself. "The Jews" is all people who identify as Jewish and the great, vast majority of "the Jews" are probably not involved in the entertainment or financial industries.I thought it was fairly well acknowledged that the Jews have a disproportionate amount of power/influence when compared to the % of population when it comes to both the entertainment and financial industries. I assume that some years back not sure if it's true now) that Asians, in particular Chinese dominated the laundry/dry cleaning services and Indians/P{Pakistani's absolutely clean up when it comes to running mini-marts, 7/11's. Is this racist of me to think this? Is it racist of me to assume all Chinese are both good at mathematics and black-belts in karate?
And what is "power/influence" supposed to mean? It's so vague that the meaning can slide wherever anyone wants it to go.
If you said that "the majority of the entertainment and financial industries are owned or controlled by Jewish people, vastly out of proportion to the percentage of the population who are Jewish," even that needs work but it's getting there. It's still the sort of statement you can't really provide any meaningful statistics for. That would require some research whereas writing something like this that sounds right to you based on other generalizations and meaningless statements you've absorbed and are now regurgitating is easy.