Jukebox Jury
Retired
Only two people are banned for life from Morrissey-Solo.
So I know who one is..... who is the other?
Is life life..... or 15 years with good behaviour?
Jukebox Jury
Only two people are banned for life from Morrissey-Solo.
That's kinda what I thought!
Why was NRitH banned? I've not been here for a few weeks, so I'm pretty out of the loop. With all these bans, though, I doubt I'll stick around for long.
Coiff.
His sig was too big. You can read more about it in the "wtf" thread that Preg's started. Flax and WinkWink were banned this week too.
I haven't been here too much lately, so I don't know all the details.
no he was banned for realzies. he told me. its lifted in a few days though. its cuz of that thread he started talking about the moderators, but he didnt really say anything wrong, just bein SNS
What!? 3 of the site's best posters gone...that sucks donkey balls.
Coiff.
What!? 3 of the site's best posters gone...that sucks donkey balls.
Coiff.
Was SNS22 banned yesterday?
Does it mean they have a dangerous sexy rebellious side like James Dean?
I go away for a few hours and it all happens.....and its all a mystery to me.
Only two people are banned for life from Morrissey-Solo.
Who is even banned? I'm not trying to start anything, just curious.
I think being banned from this site is fast become like getting an ASBO in the UK.
For those not familiar with an ASBO - they are anti social behaviour orders issued by local councils against individuals who have not been given custodial sentences. These orders prohibit people from visiting particular streets / roads / areas / being in groups of more than 4 people or from associating with certain other people.
But now with young people they are like a badge of honour. if you dont have an ASBO then you are not deemed worthy of being in a particualr circle of friends.
Grim was given a time out because he added flashing images to his signature which intended to annoy other users.
Why was NRitH banned? I've not been here for a few weeks, so I'm pretty out of the loop. With all these bans, though, I doubt I'll stick around for long.
What!? 3 of the site's best posters gone...that sucks donkey balls.
so long so low
no he was banned for realzies. he told me. its lifted in a few days though. its cuz of that thread he started talking about the moderators, but he didnt really say anything wrong, just bein SNS
I don't know
I think the good people in the united kingdom have got that covered.
Ok, I'll explain, then.
As most of you know, I don't like the way Kewpie moderates. No, really. I try my damnedest to ignore it most of the time, but there are times when her mis-moderation is so egregious that I say something about it. Do I troll her mercilessly? Do I post her personal info and pics? Do I create various usernames to attack her? No, I make what I think are wry and slightly caustic comments about what she does. The one I got banned for was this one. Was it out of line? Well, it did follow a few comments where the size of signature comments came up, and I said I wouldn't resize my crab one because nobody really enforces the 600 x 250 pixel sig pic rule (a rule which, IIRC, was instituted a few months ago because of some of my absurd past sig pics). Did I have a bad attitude about it? Sure. Was it childish? I suppose some people think so. Was it ban-worthy? Apparently, although I'm still dying to know what term of service it violated. To me, it looks capricious and unfounded. But who am I to judge that?
Blah, blah, blah. Odds are, nobody's read this far. Carry on.
Ok
But it's one of those very UK folks that are sucking the lifeblood of this place dry. And to think that she was made a moderator of a new forum that was otherwise looking like a promising alternative to this one...it defies logic.
Ok, I'll explain, then.
As most of you know, I don't like the way Kewpie moderates. No, really. I try my damnedest to ignore it most of the time, but there are times when her mis-moderation is so egregious that I say something about it. Do I troll her mercilessly? Do I post her personal info and pics? Do I create various usernames to attack her? No, I make what I think are wry and slightly caustic comments about what she does. The one I got banned for was this one. Was it out of line? Well, it did follow a few comments where the size of signature comments came up, and I said I wouldn't resize my crab one because nobody really enforces the 600 x 250 pixel sig pic rule (a rule which, IIRC, was instituted a few months ago because of some of my absurd past sig pics). Did I have a bad attitude about it? Sure. Was it childish? I suppose some people think so. Was it ban-worthy? Apparently, although I'm still dying to know what term of service it violated. To me, it looks capricious and unfounded. But who am I to judge that?
Blah, blah, blah. Odds are, nobody's read this far. Carry on.
But it's one of those very UK folks that are sucking the lifeblood of this place dry. And to think that she was made a moderator of a new forum that was otherwise looking like a promising alternative to this one...it defies logic.
shut the f*** up and leave space for other idiots to bore us to death.
No, Robby she was talking about Walter Ego
Ok, I'll explain, then.
As most of you know, I don't like the way Kewpie moderates. No, really. I try my damnedest to ignore it most of the time, but there are times when her mis-moderation is so egregious that I say something about it. Do I troll her mercilessly? Do I post her personal info and pics? Do I create various usernames to attack her? No, I make what I think are wry and slightly caustic comments about what she does. The one I got banned for was this one. Was it out of line? Well, it did follow a few comments where the size of signature comments came up, and I said I wouldn't resize my crab one because nobody really enforces the 600 x 250 pixel sig pic rule (a rule which, IIRC, was instituted a few months ago because of some of my absurd past sig pics). Did I have a bad attitude about it? Sure. Was it childish? I suppose some people think so. Was it ban-worthy? Apparently, although I'm still dying to know what term of service it violated. To me, it looks capricious and unfounded. But who am I to judge that?
Blah, blah, blah. Odds are, nobody's read this far. Carry on.
But it's one of those very UK folks that are sucking the lifeblood of this place dry. And to think that she was made a moderator of a new forum that was otherwise looking like a promising alternative to this one...it defies logic.
Some Girls Are Bigger Than Others