Scarlet Ibis
The Chicken of D.C.
But why should C.C. be held responsible for the brain she was born with? It's like blaming a mentally challenged person for not doing well in school.Sorry, I don't buy any of that. If artists weren't called weirdos, if it weren't difficult, if there was no struggle in life, what would there be to make art about? If this imaginary person is happy living her life, then great. If she's unhappy because she's somehow unfulfilled then she's going to struggle to fulfill herself. Making her the victim of an opressive society is a slap in the face of Morrissey and Linder and every other artist who has been percieved as a nutcase, ridiculed, been hated even, and who has perservered in spite of it. It lessens the impact of what they've accomplished - and one of their bigger accomplishments is developing and celebrating their own individuality in the face of severe criticism. Morrissey may have had a supportive mother but he seems to have had an unsupportive father and teachers. He didn't use that as an excuse to stop trying. If he hadn't had any desire to express himself, which comes with having talent, then there is nothing to argue about.
I disagree that artists should be made to struggle in order to express themselves. Having to struggle is no great help to any artist. An artist is someone who uncovers alternative realities, views, ways of thinking, ways of looking at things. S/he could do this even without the struggle. Imagine if the world were eager for art to be made, looking at it religiously as a way of expanding their minds, excited to help every new artist along so s/he could express something else previously unseen or unheard.
It's not like the best art is rising to the top, goodness knows! Look at what's out there. When I was in art school it wasn't the best artists who got ahead. It was the ones who were the most persistent. Being talented and being persistent are not related. Not one bit.